Thanks for calling the questionable source for this to our attention. You wrote that you called “the magazine”–you mean Good Magazine, right? When did you call? Did you ever get a response? … I would like Good Magazine to provide a link to the source so the the data can be verified. And if the data isn’t verifiable, they should offer a correction. It’s irresponsible journalism to present inaccurate information as fact, especially considering how easily bad information can spread on the internet. In my web search (on 8/19/08), I found a bunch of sites that seemed to quote the same data and the same source. Since the original source doesn’t appear to exist online, I am guessing they got the information from this site…

So sites like Good Magazine have a responsibility to make sure that their information is accurate, and to correct that information when it is found to be inaccurate.

Thanks for calling the questionable source for this to our attention. You wrote that you called “the magazine”–you mean Good Magazine, right? When did you call? Did you ever get a response? … I would like Good Magazine to provide a link to the source so the the data can be verified. And if the data isn’t verifiable, they should offer a correction. It’s irresponsible journalism to present inaccurate information as fact, especially considering how easily bad information can spread on the internet. In my web search (on 8/19/08), I found a bunch of sites that seemed to quote the same data and the same source. Since the original source doesn’t appear to exist online, I am guessing they got the information from this site…

So sites like Good Magazine have a responsibility to make sure that their information is accurate, and to correct that information when it is found to be inaccurate.