“To defend our way of life abroad we may need to reconsider how much junk food it involves at home.”To defend our way of life abroad?I think this post itself is a good defense against obesity because this kind of neocon newspeak makes my stomach sick.

I think the picture is perfect. It summarizes all that is wrong with not only Sarah, but with the news and what we think we expect from it, what we deem as ‘core values’. It’s the ultimate self-critique from Newsweek, even if unintended.

“We also have gridlock traffic. And pollution. And an addiction to foreign oil.”Is being addicted to foreign oil somehow worse than being simply “addicted to oil”?

A neocon war lover, that was what he was.

The parasite idea has been done SO many times in architecture that it ought to be an embarrassment for its author here. The only original thing about this proposal is that the structure is ‘prefab’, but from the images this seems only a stick-on label that tries to add value where there is little.

Unlike the author of this post, who early this year approved of the slaughter of hundreds of innocent civilians in the Gaza Strip, the Yes Men happen to be real progressives and said No to Israeli war crimes.

I am not a veg of any kind, but your assailment of these groups strikes me as chauvinist.Additionally, I second the commenter ‘razzing’, above; between this and your post advocating the bombing campaign which killed 1400 Gazans, 1/3 of whom were children, I am completely turned off GOOD.

Amira Hass, Israeli journalist:”History did not begin with the Qassam rockets. But for us, the Israelis, history always begins when the Palestinians hurt us, and then the pain is completely decontextualized. We think that if we cause the Palestinians much greater pain, they will finally learn their lesson. Some term this ‘achievement.’ “http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1055241.htmlAnd for GOOD editors, context begins and ends with Qassam rockets.

It’s apparently now just about proportionality, and not about the use of force in the first place. And funny you use the word ‘context’. Especially in the case of Gaza, where context ought to be include the story of Palestinian suffering previous to this massacre, it is here instead the context of just one side: the context of ‘us’.'Good’ fits well in these times. Truly Orwellian times.

“If you don’t want your schools blown up, you need to not support the terrorist organization that shoots rockets from the roof. If you don’t want tanks rolling through your streets, don’t vote for the government that is dedicated to starting a war with your much more powerful neighbor.”FACT: Every single elected government of Israel has practised state terror. Some of its major players (Read Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, and butcher extraordinaire Ariel Sharon).If the above quote is not grounds for Mr. Clendaniel’s immediate resignation from ‘GOOD’, I do not know what is.

“To defend our way of life abroad we may need to reconsider how much junk food it involves at home.”To defend our way of life abroad?I think this post itself is a good defense against obesity because this kind of neocon newspeak makes my stomach sick.

I think the picture is perfect. It summarizes all that is wrong with not only Sarah, but with the news and what we think we expect from it, what we deem as ‘core values’. It’s the ultimate self-critique from Newsweek, even if unintended.

“We also have gridlock traffic. And pollution. And an addiction to foreign oil.”Is being addicted to foreign oil somehow worse than being simply “addicted to oil”?

A neocon war lover, that was what he was.

The parasite idea has been done SO many times in architecture that it ought to be an embarrassment for its author here. The only original thing about this proposal is that the structure is ‘prefab’, but from the images this seems only a stick-on label that tries to add value where there is little.

Unlike the author of this post, who early this year approved of the slaughter of hundreds of innocent civilians in the Gaza Strip, the Yes Men happen to be real progressives and said No to Israeli war crimes.

I am not a veg of any kind, but your assailment of these groups strikes me as chauvinist.Additionally, I second the commenter ‘razzing’, above; between this and your post advocating the bombing campaign which killed 1400 Gazans, 1/3 of whom were children, I am completely turned off GOOD.

Amira Hass, Israeli journalist:”History did not begin with the Qassam rockets. But for us, the Israelis, history always begins when the Palestinians hurt us, and then the pain is completely decontextualized. We think that if we cause the Palestinians much greater pain, they will finally learn their lesson. Some term this ‘achievement.’ “http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1055241.htmlAnd for GOOD editors, context begins and ends with Qassam rockets.

It’s apparently now just about proportionality, and not about the use of force in the first place. And funny you use the word ‘context’. Especially in the case of Gaza, where context ought to be include the story of Palestinian suffering previous to this massacre, it is here instead the context of just one side: the context of ‘us’.'Good’ fits well in these times. Truly Orwellian times.

“If you don’t want your schools blown up, you need to not support the terrorist organization that shoots rockets from the roof. If you don’t want tanks rolling through your streets, don’t vote for the government that is dedicated to starting a war with your much more powerful neighbor.”FACT: Every single elected government of Israel has practised state terror. Some of its major players (Read Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, and butcher extraordinaire Ariel Sharon).If the above quote is not grounds for Mr. Clendaniel’s immediate resignation from ‘GOOD’, I do not know what is.