Sheepless is a graphic designer and author living in Brooklyn, New York.
He is the founder of Sheepless Co., a creative practice dedicated to providing deliberate, considered solutions in design and advocacy for small businesses and artistic or cultural organizations affecting positive social change.sheepless’ website:
http://sheeplessco.com
Anonymous #2 — that’s not what he’s saying. But clearly advocating further consumption is not going to save anything, offset or not.
Sorry, didn’t mean to be all “anonymous” about it.
So here’s an etymological question then. Is “boo” a derivation of “bookie-sugs” (sort of makes sense) or did it come from a mispronunciation of “beau”, which is what I always assumed?
This actually seems the opposite of supportive to me. Lumping the desire to ‘gay marry’ an inanimate object in with actual love and commitment between two men or two women reduces the latter to a level of absurdity. Sorry, but my love for my partner is not anything like your love for the fifth season of a television show, and to say it is does not do us any favors. What am I missing here?
Anonymous #2 — that’s not what he’s saying. But clearly advocating further consumption is not going to save anything, offset or not.
Sorry, didn’t mean to be all “anonymous” about it.
So here’s an etymological question then. Is “boo” a derivation of “bookie-sugs” (sort of makes sense) or did it come from a mispronunciation of “beau”, which is what I always assumed?
This actually seems the opposite of supportive to me. Lumping the desire to ‘gay marry’ an inanimate object in with actual love and commitment between two men or two women reduces the latter to a level of absurdity. Sorry, but my love for my partner is not anything like your love for the fifth season of a television show, and to say it is does not do us any favors. What am I missing here?