Joey Aabout 1 year ago
Wikipedia is not a valid source and should not be treated as one, although I do see where you got your argument from this. It would make sense, but the wording of the law itself is already prejudiced towards one side. This law states "1-(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis," There is no further broadening of the case beyond a male attacking a victim. There is nothing in there about females being perpetrators at all. You say that any female attack is deemed Sexual Assault (which carries a lighter sentence), yet they are virtually the same act. Why should one side be penalized more or less for something that is an atrocity no matter who commits it? Would you hang a black man for stealing $20 and let a white woman go for the same crime? I thought not.