Right On5 months ago
First and foremost, the evolutionary false theory has been proven time and time again as lacking foundation. From Lucy in the Congo (Louis B. Leakey found - is an orangutang), Cro-magnon (brain capacity larger than human - is modern man), Neanderthal man (brain capacity larger than human - is modern man), Piltdown man (determined hoax after forty years). Then there is DNA, which has shown that proteins do not change as the evolutionists have believed. Bone structure and skin, both made of protein, are known not have uniform mutations of their DNA. Evolutionary false theories have changed or had materially different explanations at least 4 times in the last thirty years. Oh yah, there are no links to man. NONE. The evolutionists will tell you that there are, but they have had absolutely no evidence. Just because you say something is does not make it so. Those that think they came from an amoeba, well it does seem like they did with their kind of reasoning. So amoeba evolved to take advantage of food sources that just happen to be evolving at the same time. Interesting. In other words, the evolving amoeba evolved into a form that could be sustained. The species changed its digestive system, its nervous system, its mental capacity, its physical traits to survive in the environment. The amoeba must have known how to change its systems in unison to insure the next link's preservation, or did it? So within the amoeba there is all this ability to anticipate the needs of the next link. I think we have given the amoeba too much credit. After all it is only a single cell and has limited ability. To answer the question. The chicken came before the egg, or how else was the egg incubated? How old is this question and it is now simply answered? I got this answer in a church service five years ago. Before that I had never known this answer and I believe this answer was not well known.