GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 1
  • 2

“Let’s not Rumsfeld Afghanistan”

  • Posted by: Mark Peters
  • on August 14, 2009 at 7:14 am

The birth of another political eponym

As we know,
There are known knowns.
There are things we know we know.
We also know
There are known unknowns.
That is to say
We know there are some things
We do not know.
But there are also unknown unknowns.
The ones we don’t know we don’t know.

—Donald Rumsfeld (linebreaks by Hart Seely, editor of Pieces of Intelligence: The Existential Poetry of Donald H. Rumsfeld)

No it’s not National Poetry Month (that’s April), and Donald Rumsfeld hasn’t gone the way of Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett. The former Secretary of Defense is on the mind of word nerds like myself for a different and far more amusing reason: his name has become, at least briefly, an eponym—one of those words that started as a name. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina got creative on “Face the Nation”, saying “We made mistakes in Iraq. Let’s not ‘Rumsfeld’ Afghanistan. Let’s not do this thing on the cheap.”

The political poetry of Graham’s coinage is even more delicious than Rumsfeld’s own verse: to Rumsfeld Afghanistan is vivid and clear. It expresses an important worry in a concise fashion—all Strunk and White-huggers should love it. But how did Donald Rumsfeld get to be known as the chief cheapskate of 21st century war?

The poor planning and general shoddiness of the early years of the Iraq war are the main reasons, plus Rumsfeld’s own oft-quoted words, “You go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time.” The fact that such lame reasoning came in response to soldiers complaining about lack of equipment and protection only made things worse for Rummy, who became the poster child for a quagmire, until his resignation in 2006.

Politics has been a major contributor of eponyms, as my fellow American Dialect Society members (especially Joel S. Berson, Laurence Horn, Steve Kleinedler, Clai Rice, Dave Wilton, Ben Zimmer, and Arnold Zwicky) reminded me this week. Pander—perhaps the ultimate political word these days—is derived from the name Pandarus, who the Oxford English Dictionary describes as “a Trojan archer who is said to have procured for Troilus the love and good graces of Chryseis.” A more contemporary example—the Paul Simon song “A Simple Desultory Philippic (or How I Was Robert McNamara’d into Submission)”—is eerily reminiscent of Rumsfeld. The OED recently added entries for Presidential words Bushism, Bushian, Bushist, Clintonesque, and Clintonista. Clintonian was already included, but it was coined originally for George Clinton—the vice-president, not the legendary funkster.

For some reason, Supreme Court nominees have been prone to eponymization, maybe due to the length and drama of the pre-appointment hearings. The most notable was Bork, a term that still gets used, as in a recent Savannah Morning News editorial: “The public is ill-served when qualified nominees get ‘Borked’—a term that originated when Democratic senators savaged Reagan nominee Judge Robert Bork and set the stage for future partisan ugliness.” Other terms such as Miered and Soutered have appeared, though they don’t seem to have caught on. Bork probably had two advantages in becoming a successful word: it immortalized a memorable political smackdown, and the word bork is vivid and punchy. Hell, it’s a four-letter word, and we all know how much better people feel after saying them. Given the relative uneventfulness of the Sonia Sotomayor hearings and the length of her name, I doubt we’ll be hearing about much Sotomayoring in the latest blogs and tweets, but that term has been coined too.

There’s no way of knowing if Rumsfeld will last long beyond this column: it could probably use our help. Consider the possibilities:

If your spouse—who is known for bungling home repair—proclaims a new mission to renovate the gazebo, you could say, “Honey, please don’t pull another Rumsfeld on this family.”

The word could be used to call out various tightwads, misers, skinflints, and lousy tippers: “Never eat out with Steve. He’s a real Rumsfelder.”

When your NBA team is dumping players and salaries just to avoid the luxury tax, say, “Hey! You can’t win a championship by Rumsfelding.”

The word could even be used in positive ways: “Guess what, kids? We saved enough to buy a boat! No more Rumsfelding.”

  • Filed under: Blog : Wordtastic
  • Categories: Politics
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 2 Comments
    • Posted by: Max Schorr
    • on August 14, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    Amusing. I think the challenge for this catching on is the extra baggage with the word. Hard to just think of cheapness and not stubborn close-mindedness, or the act of bullying your way into a huge mistake and denying it as long as possible. 

    • Posted by: FA-QUE-NAZI-LIBS
    • on August 20, 2009 at 3:24 am

    This is a pretty brain dead article.  So Rumsfeld did not spend enough?  What about the Cluster know known as Afganistan where hundreds of men are dying and Furher Obama states are goal is NOT victory.  I think LIBS should stick to excessive drug use and ROLL BACK IN THE GUTTER SCUMBAGS

Login or Sign up to discuss this article

Related Content

  • Blog : Wordtastic

    In Political Slang, "Pork" Is a Staple

    The many linguistic uses of pork—from pork barrel to porkulus and beyond. “Pork pork pork!” So said the Swedish chef. Or ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Magazine : Transparency

    Transparency: Supreme Court Nominations

    Since President Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to replace Justice Souter on the Supreme Court, there has been ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : Wordtastic

    Word-istan: A Powerful Suffix Making Stops in Bailout-istan and Trash-can-istan

    Though language is my beat, I couldn’t help making some geographical observations: “Vietnam-istan” is one name and ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Rumsfeld Shown The Door

    Big day for politics. Rumsfeld resigns. He's being replaced by former CIA chief Robert Gates. The ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : Wordtastic

    The Global War on Whatchamacallit

    Terrorism euphemisms of the Obama Era As the economy—along with most prospects for the future of humanity—nosedived off ...
    Read & Discuss

Recent Readers

  • Lars
  • The Postindustrialist
  • Will Etling
  • Gavin Potenza
  • Amrit
  • Price
See all

This Week In Blogs

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. How Thanksgiving Got Its Turkey
  2. Is Newsweek’s Sarah Palin Cover Sexist?
  3. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  4. Prison and College: California’s Ridiculous Priorities
  5. Are You Raising a Furkid?
  6. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  7. Sad or Cute: Hermit Crab Makes Home in Broken Bottle
  8. The Charter for Compassion
  9. Tips on How to Reduce Food Packaging Waste
  10. New School: How the Web Liberalized Liberal Arts Education
  1. The Charter for Compassion
  2. New School: How the Web Liberalized Liberal Arts Education
  3. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  4. Singularity 101: What Is the Singularity?
  5. Picture Show: Breach
  6. Intermission: Eye-popping 3D Building Projections
  7. Charging Forward with Mission Motor’s Electric Superbike
  8. EyeWriter: Paralyzed Artist Draws with His Eyes
  9. Tips on How to Reduce Food Packaging Waste
  10. Prison and College: California’s Ridiculous Priorities

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata