GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 0
  • 1

He Said, She Said

  • Posted by: Patrick James
  • on June 13, 2008 at 12:32 am

Last night, the Times’ website ran a piece by Katherine Q. Seele and Julie Bosman about the varied opinions concerning Hillary Clinton’s media coverage—was it sexist or not? It’s worth reading, but the takeaway seems to be this: While it’s clear that she did endure some sexist coverage, it’s not clear whether that coverage prevented her from earning the nomination she sought. The question of whether sexist media coverage was the reason she didn’t secure the nomination is probably an overly reductive one. And blaming the media is a perennial tactic when hope is lost. But the issue of whether women can receive fair treatment in print, on TV, and online is one that will be here for a long time to come.

  • Filed under: Blog : GOOD Blog
  • Categories: Politics
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 1 Comment
    • Posted by: dinkerank
    • on June 20, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    Hear this people. Sexism had absolutely nothing to do with the failed attempt of the Clinton Machine to win this primary race to the white house. Hillary

    Clinton was the primary cause of her failed attempt to win the 2008 primaries. We all know that Senator Clinton is a very qualified person. And not only that. She is a very good person. We all love Hillary. Her lost was due to her inability to compete with Barack Obama and his political machine. This young man ran a genus of a campain. His style of politics was just too much for the Clinton’s to handle. You know that is the truth. You just don’t want to admit it.

Login or Sign up to discuss this article

Related Content

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    The SNL Factor

    Saturday Night Live got a big shout out from Hillary Clinton in the Democratic debate in Cleveland two weeks ago ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Blame These 25 People for the Financial Mess

    While assigning blame for things is rarely productive, Time's interactive list of the 25 people to ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    There's Still Time

    If you're anywhere in the Pacific time zone, you can probably still make it to your polling ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Vanity Fair Recycles Convoluted Celebrity Cover, Not Paper

    Vanity Fair's third annual Green Issue is currently on newsstands. You've probably noticed the cover—Madonna bearing the ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    It Is, Apparently, Impossible To Be Green

    A while back Vanity Fair announced they would be putting out a “green� issue in mid-April. To complement the ridiculously ...
    Read & Discuss

Recent Readers

  • Wolfgang Loppacher
  • morganclendaniel
  • Shanny21m
  • Bryan Helm
  • guynamedtopher
  • Mafalda
  • lirontocker
  • J.Mann
  • Ben Goldhirsh
  • John DuBois
  • crowcrag
  • JuliaOsovskaya
See all

This Week In Blogs

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. How Thanksgiving Got Its Turkey
  2. Is Newsweek’s Sarah Palin Cover Sexist?
  3. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  4. Prison and College: California’s Ridiculous Priorities
  5. Are You Raising a Furkid?
  6. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  7. Sad or Cute: Hermit Crab Makes Home in Broken Bottle
  8. The Charter for Compassion
  9. Tips on How to Reduce Food Packaging Waste
  10. New School: How the Web Liberalized Liberal Arts Education
  1. The Charter for Compassion
  2. New School: How the Web Liberalized Liberal Arts Education
  3. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  4. Singularity 101: What Is the Singularity?
  5. Picture Show: Breach
  6. Intermission: Eye-popping 3D Building Projections
  7. Charging Forward with Mission Motor’s Electric Superbike
  8. EyeWriter: Paralyzed Artist Draws with His Eyes
  9. Tips on How to Reduce Food Packaging Waste
  10. Prison and College: California’s Ridiculous Priorities

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata