He Said, She Said
- Posted by: Patrick James
- on June 13, 2008 at 12:32 am

Last night, the Times’ website ran a piece by Katherine Q. Seele and Julie Bosman about the varied opinions concerning Hillary Clinton’s media coverage—was it sexist or not? It’s worth reading, but the takeaway seems to be this: While it’s clear that she did endure some sexist coverage, it’s not clear whether that coverage prevented her from earning the nomination she sought. The question of whether sexist media coverage was the reason she didn’t secure the nomination is probably an overly reductive one. And blaming the media is a perennial tactic when hope is lost. But the issue of whether women can receive fair treatment in print, on TV, and online is one that will be here for a long time to come.











DISCUSSION: 1 Comment
Hear this people. Sexism had absolutely nothing to do with the failed attempt of the Clinton Machine to win this primary race to the white house. Hillary
Clinton was the primary cause of her failed attempt to win the 2008 primaries. We all know that Senator Clinton is a very qualified person. And not only that. She is a very good person. We all love Hillary. Her lost was due to her inability to compete with Barack Obama and his political machine. This young man ran a genus of a campain. His style of politics was just too much for the Clinton’s to handle. You know that is the truth. You just don’t want to admit it.