- May 24, 2006 • 9:12 am PDT
- + responses
If you didn't see the story in yesterday's NYT about the state of the Clinton marriage, it's well worth reading just because it is so amusing that someone would use their powers of investigative journalism to delve so deeply into how many days a month the couple spends together. But then this post got us really excited: "A genuinely relevant political article in the New York Times would involve a detailed examination of the sex lives of all non-married members of the Bush administration." We would love to see this article. Not necessarily to expose the hypocrisy of those advocating abstinence-only education, but mostly because it would be fascinating to know who Condi was sleeping with. And gross. Fascinating in a car accident sort of way.
.JPG)
