GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 4
  • 10

Leftovers for All

  • Posted by: Lilibet
  • on September 24, 2007 at 3:08 pm

When you throw leftovers in the fridge, they end up in the trash far more often than in your stomach—a dilemma that some conscientious restaurant-goers solve by leaving their doggie bags on top of city garbage cans, where the homeless can find an easy free meal. Josh Kamler and Axel Albin, owners of a San Francisco design studio, would like to take this practice mainstream. They’ve come up with a catchy name (“replating”), a website, and a logo not unlike the now-ubiquitous recycling icon. Kamler says, “If you throw your beer bottle in the garbage, people are like, ‘Dude, you’re not going to recycle that?’ We hope the idea of replating will get to such a place in the culture that people will say, ‘Hey, you’re not going to replate that?’”

LEARN MORE
replate.org

  • Filed under: Magazine : Look
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 10 Comments
    • Posted by: jsobotor
    • on October 8, 2007 at 6:33 pm

    Is it science or stigma living inside the heads of parents who admonish the youngster caught sneaking a bite of food without considering the source? Taking food from the trash (or even from the top of a trash-can) may disrupt societal norms but I believe hunger eventually takes precedence.

    If one eats away from home, albeit with special care to avoid contamination after the kitchen, isn’t spoilage the only ? If so, what else keeps us from ‘replating’ meals? By encouraging individuals and businesses to expand on the idea (perhaps reprogramming some social norms along the way) we can avoid a silly and costly form of waste.

    • Posted by: kizlives
    • on October 17, 2007 at 11:05 am

    Would love to check this out – could someone list the website?

    • Posted by: lofat
    • on October 26, 2007 at 12:43 pm

    It’s not like you can walk down any sidewalk without tripping over a homeless person in SF. I am all for helping when and where I can and I applaud others for thinking of ways to help and reduce waste but I have found that the direct hand off works best for me.

    I can’t help but be concerned about how unsanitary eating food left on a trash can might be or about the ill nature of some who might find it funny to poison, drug, or spit on re-plated food.

    As someone who was active with Food Not Bombs in SF during the Frank Jordan years, I can see the need to help feed. We were faced with arrest and jail on a regular basis with ‘health concerns’ being cited as the primary reason for the police harassment but we trudged on. Based on that experience though, I don’t see this as something that will fair well with the officials, but I can see it catching on with diners out on the town.

    Still the personal hand off seems the best route to take when available.

    • Posted by: shwizle
    • on October 30, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    Here is the link: [url=http://www.replate.org/[/url]

    The logo could use some work IMO.

    Regarding the actual idea, I think it’s neat that people are both eliminating waste and feeding homeless. However, I wonder if this could have an unintended negative side effect of encouraging poor people not to look for a job, etc, becaue now they can have free meals.

    I’m all for philanthropy, however I believe that people will not learn anything by simply being given something without earning it in someway.

    • Posted by: shwizle
    • on October 30, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    http://www.replate.org/

    • Posted by: krashee
    • on November 6, 2007 at 3:49 pm

    I found this to be a very interesting alternative to a law that was attempting passage in Las Vegas, NV outlawing feeding the homeless. I’m not sure if ever hit the books, but a little over a year ago it had quite a bit of support. I wonder what causes the difference in mindsets on this subject?

    • Posted by: Safetyman
    • on November 9, 2007 at 1:42 pm

    Good intent but… How about putting it a plastic ziplock bag. It will reduce insect/parasite contamination.

    Leaving food out for the poor with personally handing it them seems sort of elitist…maybe.

    But a helping hand is still a helping hand.

    • Posted by: Ericthered
    • on November 13, 2007 at 9:52 am

    Its a great idea, as a fellow commentator, said one has only to look at the numbers of homeless in San Francisco, to see the need for a more responsible attitude to food

    Memorial Gifts

    • Posted by: Pancakepopple
    • on November 19, 2007 at 11:01 pm

    In Boston on Charles Street the Upper Crust Pizzeria always used to leave their leftover pizzas on top of the trash cans at night, the hungry homeless and college students would go to get free food. I had several friends who went to eat the pizza knowing that it was sanitary enough!

    • Posted by: akymbo784
    • on December 11, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    This whole concept is completely tacky, disgusting, and lazy. Yes, it’s true that there are hungry people who sift through garbage cans as a way to feed themselves, but has anyone taken into consideration that it’s because your local food pantry or soup kitchen isn’t getting donations like it used to? (Check out a recent article at ABC.com Why not give food to your local anti-hunger organization or start a campaign to encourage caterers and local restaurants to DONATE leftovers (not the half-eaten kind) to these groups? (Island Harvest in New York is an EXCELLENT example.)

    As someone who works for an anti-hunger advocacy agency, I have to stress the importance of REAL advocacy. Leaving your leftover burrito on a trash can is not only unhealthy but it doesn’t come anywhere near fixing any real problems.

Login or Sign up to discuss this article

About The Contributors

  • Lilibet Snellings

    Lilibet

     

Recent Readers

  • Adam Starr
  • zachfrechette
  • Patrick Brown
  • KBliss
  • Katherine Kelly Guntner
  • Mary Anne Christopher
  • AndrewHazlett
  • Casey Caplowe
  • Erin Mazursky
  • Sebastian Buck
  • naschmitz
  • clodhoppers18
See all

Related Content

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Preserve And Protect

    Next time you’re having a get-together (and we’re having one, tomorrow night) you might want to consider using Preserve plates ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : The Community Board

    360 Paper Bottle

    CHALLENGEEach day, Americans throw out 60 million plastic bottles. Only 14% actually get recycled—meaning 86% become garbage or litter. We ...
    Read & Discuss

  • General : The Community Board

    Excuse Me ???

    You claim to have seen an ocean of pollution "You never want to go there it's too difficult!" but you ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : The Community Board

    Inspiring Logo Designs

    Logos represent corporate identity. It is one of the most important elements in a company’s public image. First impressions are ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Magazine : Design Solutions

    How Do We Understand Each Other?

    Navigating the world's linguistic babble has been one of the great feats of design.
    Read & Discuss

This Week In Magazine

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  2. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  3. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Treaty
  4. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  5. The GOOD Guide to COP15: An Introduction
  6. The Kids Are All Right
  7. Transparency: How Education Spending Affects Graduation Rates
  8. Action, In Words and Pictures
  9. Picture Show: Breach
  10. LOOK: On the Road with Ethos Alliance
  1. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  2. The Kids Are All Right
  3. Picture Show: Breach
  4. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  5. The GOOD Guide to COP15: An Introduction
  6. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  7. The Offal Truth
  8. The GOOD 100: Gay Marriage
  9. LOOK: PACT Sustainable Underwear
  10. Project: Islands for Islands

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata