Comments on: Photoshopping Ethics http://www.good.is/post/photoshopping_ethics/ GOOD Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:58:29 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: acc http://www.good.is/post/photoshopping_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-7706 acc Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.good.is/photoshopping_ethics#comment-7706 It's never good when your blog post resemble Tyra Banks Show "hot and completely irrelevant" topics.<br><br /> <br><br /> How about an option for i don't give a damn. It’s never good when your blog post resemble Tyra Banks Show “hot and completely irrelevant” topics.

How about an option for i don’t give a damn.

]]> By: superfamous http://www.good.is/post/photoshopping_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-7707 superfamous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.good.is/photoshopping_ethics#comment-7707 Perhaps by now, as most people know fashion photographs are manipulated to the point of the model being a mere inspiration for the eventual image, we no longer have to classify this as "unnatural". The next step in this process is a fully computer generated "photograph", which interestingly enough seems not at all subject to the same criticisms that this type of image manipulation receives right now, simply because the "source person" was never born. Also think about make-up effects and image manipulation in movies... Gollum...CG actors in games...etc. Perhaps by now, as most people know fashion photographs are manipulated to the point of the model being a mere inspiration for the eventual image, we no longer have to classify this as “unnatural”. The next step in this process is a fully computer generated “photograph”, which interestingly enough seems not at all subject to the same criticisms that this type of image manipulation receives right now, simply because the “source person” was never born. Also think about make-up effects and image manipulation in movies… Gollum…CG actors in games…etc.

]]>