socialism

Socialism depends on victims for its very existence.

under the guise of rewarding the helpless and caring

for people it elevates incompetence to a virtue

worthy of the sacrifice of others,

indeed dependent on the

sacrifice of others for its mere survival.



You've heard it said that this is an age of moral

crisis and that Man's sins are destroying the world.

But your chief virtue has been sacrifice, and you've

demanded more sacrifices at every disaster. You've

sacrificed justice to mercy and happiness to duty.

So how could things turn out differently.



The world is only the product of your sacrifices.

While you were dragging the men who made your

happiness possible to your sacrificial altars, you

were playing a dangerous game. Rewarding ineptitude



while condemning productivity has driven the majority

of our nations production off shore. Plus a large

portion of the real producers. The people who sought

to do their best no matter where it would take them.



I am trying to

explain the consequences of your

'brother-love' morality, which you have been

too

innocently generous to understand.



I stand against your creed of unearned rewards and

unrewarded duties. I teach the morality of Reason,

that it is right to pursue one's own happiness as

one's principal goal in life. I don't consider the

pleasure of others my goal in life, nor do I consider

my pleasure the goal of anyone else's life.



I am a trader. I earn what I get in trade for what I

produce. I ask for nothing more or nothing less than

what I earn. That is justice. I don't force anyone

to

trade with me. I only trade for mutual benefit.



Force is the great evil that has no place in a rational free

world. One may never force another human to act

against his/her judgment. If you deny a man's right to

Reason, you

must also deny your right to your own

judgment.



Yet socialism is a world run by means of

force, by men who claim that fear and joy are equal

incentives, but that fear and force are more practical.

We've allowed such men to occupy positions of power in

the world by preaching that all men are evil from the

moment they're born.

When men believe this, they see

nothing wrong in acting in any way they please. The

name of this absurdity is 'original sin'. That's

impossible. That which is outside the possibility of

choice is also outside the province of morality. To

call sin that which is outside man's choice is a

mockery of justice. To

say that men are born with a

free will but with a tendency toward evil is

ridiculous. If the tendency is one of choice, it

doesn't come at birth. If it is not a tendency of

choice, then man's will is not free.



And then there's the 'brother-love' morality. Why is

it moral to serve others, but not yourself? If

enjoyment is a value, why is it moral when

experienced by others, but not by you?

Why is it immoral to produce something of value and keep it

for yourself, when it is moral for others who haven't earned it

to accept it? If it's virtuous to give, isn't it then

selfish to take?



Your acceptance of the code of selflessness has made

you fear the man who has a dollar less than you

because it makes you feel that that dollar is

rightfully his.

You hate the man with a dollar more

than you because the dollar he's keeping is

rightfully yours.



This code has made it impossible to know when

to give and when to grab.



You know that you can't

give away everything and

starve yourself. You've forced yourselves to live with

undeserved, irrational guilt. Is it ever proper to

help another man? No, not if he demands it as his

right or as a duty that you owe him. Yes, if it's your

own free choice based on your judgment of the value of

that person and

his struggle. This country wasn't

built by men who sought handouts. In its

brilliant

youth, this country showed the rest of the world what

greatness was possible to Man and what happiness is

possible on Earth.



Then it began apologizing for its greatness and

began giving away its wealth, feeling guilty for having

produced more than its neighbors.



Years ago, I saw what was wrong with the world and where the

battle for Life had to be fought. I saw that the enemy was an

inverted morality and that my acceptance of that

morality was its only

power. That is why it always

seeks new ways to enforce its power. Perceived

power

is its only means of survival.



To those of you who retain some remnant of dignity and

the will to live your lives for yourselves, you have

the chance to make the same choice. Examine your

values and understand that you must choose one side or

the

other. Any compromise between good and evil only

hurts the good and helps the evil.



If you've understood what I've said, stop supporting

your destroyers. Don't accept their philosophy.



Those who run for office based on the principles

of

socialism have no place in a Free Republic.

They are the destroyers of the free world. The servants of the

behind the scenes power brokers. They seek to exploit

your compassion. Your destroyers hold you by means

of your endurance, your generosity, your innocence, and your love.

Don't exhaust

yourself to help build the

kind of world that you see around you now.



In the name of the best within you, don't sacrifice the world

to those who will take away your happiness for it.

The world will change when you are ready to pronounce this oath:



I

swear by my Life and my love of it that I will

never live for the sake of

another man,

nor ask another man to live for the sake of mine.



True Capitalism on the other hand demands the best

of every man, his rationality, his reason, and rewards

him accordingly. It leaves every man free to

choose

the work he likes, to specialize in it, to trade his

product for the products of others, and to go as far

on the road of achievement as his ability and

ambition will carry him. And to allow others to do the same by

virtue of his own ambition reason applied to the

trades he makes with others for the

products of

their own best efforts.