GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 5
  • 10

Steal This Idea: Wind Powered Subways

  • Posted by: NicholasFelton
  • on June 6, 2007 at 7:19 pm

New York City’s Mayor, Michael Bloomberg, recently announced a massive plan to dramatically increase the city’s level of sustainability by 2030. Here is an idea that might help the Big Apple reach its goal. It’s free for the taking.

The idea:

Each year, the New York subway system uses 1.8-billion kilowatt-hours of electricity, making it the city’s single largest consumer of electricity. What if the subway’s MetroCard machines offered the option of paying a small premium to purchase the rider’s share of electricity from non-polluting wind power instead of traditional hydroelectric, nuclear, and fossil fuel sources?

How it might work:

For its residential customers, ConEdison—the city’s only electricity company—charges an additional 2.5 cents per kilowatt-hour to use wind energy. The average subway ride uses 1.2 kilowatt-hours of power (based on 1.5 billion 2006 rides), which means the wind power surcharge would amount to 3 extra cents a ride—a 1.5 percent increase from the normal $2 charge.

What it means:

With a 1.5 percent surcharge, a seven-day unlimited pass would

cost $24.36 (up from $24), and a 30-day unlimited pass would cost $77.14 (up from $76). Say the surcharge was 5 percent—those prices would only increase to $25.20 and $79.80. A 5-percent per ride surcharge with a slim 10-percent participant rate could inject as much as $15 million into the wind-power market annually.

  • Filed under: Magazine : Marketplace
  • Categories: Environment
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 10 Comments
    • Posted by: musicdoggy
    • on July 11, 2007 at 10:33 pm

    I love the idea; but, I can only imagine how many people will still be unwilling to pay the extra 36 cents for the one-week pass.

    • Posted by: meech
    • on July 14, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    Love the idea, but I’m not going to hold my breath on this one. Instead, I encourage everyone to switch their home electric to wind power. It’s very easy to do on-line, once you find the right link, of course:

    http://www.poweryourway.com/

    We need to make alternative avenues a success in order to make them a viable alternative in the public domain.

    • Posted by: meech
    • on July 14, 2007 at 2:12 pm

    Sorry, I forgot which one I signer up on (ConEd site is a mess). Here’s another link:

    http://conedsolutions.com

    • Posted by: frailazures
    • on August 3, 2007 at 2:28 pm

    why make it optional???

    • Posted by: nddicola
    • on August 7, 2007 at 12:20 am

    Because they are beyond encouraging, exciting, and hopeful.

    But what about us in the sticks!?! :)

    • Posted by: twining
    • on December 16, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    This is a brilliant idea. It takes an energy efficient mass transit system and multiplies the positive impact by powering it by non-polluting windpower. For pennies the mass transit rider helps grow demand for windpower driving more innovation.

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on March 3, 2009 at 11:22 am

    yea why not make  it mandatory people are cheap the economys in the crapper

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on March 4, 2009 at 12:00 am

    There is 0% storage in the electric grid, it’s only able to produce 20% of the time if your lucky. Wind is just hot air. Should put a windmill in congress or W.H.

    • Posted by: Pollusk
    • on March 20, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Since when is hydroelectric and nuclear power polluting?

    • Posted by: nlange41
    • on October 6, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    I don’t believe hydroelectric power is polluting, but nuclear?  What would you call all the waste that is being buried in the mountains?

Login or Sign up to discuss this article

About The Contributors

  • Nicholas Felton

    NicholasFelton

     

Recent Readers

  • davidzet
  • Amrit
  • Facebook User
  • jmuspratt
  • Will Etling
  • keithmtb
  • riasaurusrex
  • John DuBois
  • Price
  • atleyzgoodmagazi
  • Eric Small
  • disarmthetoys
See all

Related Content

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Nissan Leaf EV to Hit Market in Late 2010

    Nissan's Leaf is a zero-emission, 100-percent electric vehicle, and it actually looks fairly attractive. But even ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : Cities, Rethought

    Rethinking Cities: Public Safety and Oil and Gas

      Crime Prediction Software: Richmond, Virginia Starting in 2006, the Richmond Police Department didn’t just get  proactive about crime—it ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Countdown to “Grid Parity”

    The day will come when solar power isn’t just for treehugging eccentrics, but is as cheap, or cheaper, than buying ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Miles per Gallon: Soon to Be Useless

    With any luck, we'll be moving on from these gas-only automobiles in the coming years and that means ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    California's Got Impressive New Renewable Energy Standards. Do They Matter?

    From The New York Times Green, Inc. blog: California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed an executive order today ...
    Read & Discuss

This Week In Magazine

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  2. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  3. The GOOD Guide to COP15: An Introduction
  4. The Kids Are All Right
  5. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  6. Picture Show: Breach
  7. LOOK: On the Road with Ethos Alliance
  8. Transparency: How Education Spending Affects Graduation Rates
  9. Action, In Words and Pictures
  10. Transparency: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch
  1. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  2. Picture Show: Breach
  3. The Kids Are All Right
  4. The GOOD Guide to COP15: An Introduction
  5. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  6. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  7. Transparency: The Change in Carbon Emissions
  8. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Treaty
  9. Action, In Words and Pictures
  10. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Players

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata