That Job Loss Chart In Your Inbox Isn’t As Bad As You Think
- Posted by: Morgan Clendaniel
- on February 9, 2009 at 4:25 pm

You’ve almost certainly been sent this chart or seen it on a blog (BoingBoing and Andrew Sullivan being the biggest culprits I’ve seen). Now trust me, I’m pretty sure the economy is in the crapper, but this chart is a wee bit misleading.
That plunging green line, that’s the total number of job losses during this recession, as compared to the two recessions before it. You know what happened in between those recessions? We created a lot of jobs and got a lot more people. So, while the total number of unemployed may be greater this time around, percentage wise (which is what the unemployment rate is), we’re still doing ok. And by “ok” I mean, still really horribly but just about as horribly as the last three recessions. You should also note that the last two recessions (1990 and 2001) were much, much less bad than this one to begin with. It’s really more helpful to compare this to 1981, when things were at a level of badness comensurate with what we’re experiencing now. Take a look at this chart:

This is a chart (via the Corner) that shows the unemployment rate during the recessions. As you can see, while the numbers start at different places, the rate of increase is basically the same. So, don’t worry too much, this recession is still performing just like we think a recession should. But, also remember that job losses generally peak after the recession had officially ended. So, either things are secretly getting better and we’ll find out soon, or, more likely, we potentially have a long, long way to go.


DISCUSSION: 4 Comments
This chart is like your second one but accounts for the differences in initial unemployment rate by looking at the percent change in rate and also shows the recovery.
and an even better chart.
I think, though, that the
National Review (are we trusting them w/ economic information now?) chart is even more misleading that the original.
Unemployment rates are calculated somewhat differently now than they
were in the 80s. (From what I understand–and I’m no economist–it has something to do w/ disability and something to do w/ changes to the definition of “discouraged workers”.)
Using 1981 stat methods, the current unemployment rate would be at least 12%, not the 7.2% that is currently claimed.
Of course there’s plenty of argument to be made that the unemployment
rate number itself is a silly calculation altogether and we should really be paying attention to continuing jobless claims. (Ideally as a percentage rather than raw numbers.) Or at least a different type of unemployment rate than the U3 that’s considered official.
We’ve crossed mid 2009 and it is a welcome relief to know that the overall productivity is increasing. Usually productivity falls in a recession. So there are overall some good signs. But we are all scared about the jobs. Is your job in danger? There is a survey that can help you do get to know if your job is in danger or not at http://www.angstcorner.com