When you look back at how people lived 50 years ago, in 1975, many things appear quite ridiculous through a modern lens. Back then, people used to smoke everywhere, it was common for people to throw litter out of their car windows while driving, and they rarely wore seatbelts. In retrospect, it seems like a pretty savage time.

That begs the question: what things will people do in 2025 that will appear ridiculous when those in 2075 look back on us? There are likely to be many aspects of our everyday lives that we accept without judgment, which will make people shake their heads in the future.

future, science breakthroughs, entertainment, judgments, modern lens, 1975, people
Manu00a0looks through a looking glass. Image via Canva – Photo by RichVintage

A new thread on r/TrueAskReddit posed an interesting question: “What’s something we do today that people in the future will probably think is totally ridiculous?”

Redditors started chiming in with opinions on what we’ve collectively decided is socially acceptable. They offered both a humorous and critical commentary on everything from our health practices to entertainment. It’s a captivating thought experiment to consider what our everyday habits might look like in the not-so-distant future.

1. Store it in plastic

plastic, tupperware, plastic plates, dishwashers, food, stores, microwave, packaging, reusable plastic
Man holding Tupperware. Image via Canva – Photo by shisheng ling

We not only store our food in plastic, but we also place that same food in the microwave. User u/Wolly_wompous said, Packaging all our food in plastic, drinking from (and reusing) plastic water bottles, putting plastic plates and cups in dishwashers or microwaves. Microplastics galore, running through our bloodstream.”

Mentioning how past generations dealt with the issue of lead poisoning, u/HugeTheWall responded, Plastic is the lead of our generation.”

A 2025 study on plastic in The Guardian found that microplastics were invading our blood vessels. This plastic infestation of our bodies leads to reproductive issues and developmental problems in infants.

2. Chemotherapy as a health treatment

physical health, doctors, chemotherapy, treatments, anesthesia, cancer, mortality, medicine
Receiving Chemotherapy. Image via Canva – Photo by Fatcamera

Acknowledging the challenges of treating health issues with aggressive medicine, u/ImGoingToSayOneThing felt, “I think chemotherapy is going to go in the same bucket as doctors amputating people without anesthesia, not washing hands, not sterilizing, and all the other weird medical things we stupidly did.”

In the sad but true category, u/AnaWannaPita added, “Yeah, chemo is basically hoping the cancer dies before the person does.”

Chemotherapy, when combined with other therapies, leads to improved survival rates. However, the effectiveness varies greatly based on type, treatment regimen, and individual patient factors. According to the 2025 figures published by the American Cancer Society, over a five-year period, about 69% of people survive from all cancers. That’s up from 49% which was the success rate for the 1970s.

3. Surgery for beauty

beauty standard, plastic surgery, botox, aesthetics, surgery, filles, community, status, attractiveness
Young woman receives Botox injection. Image via Canva – Photo by Prostock-studio

The need to be more aesthetically attractive by any means necessary was expressed by u/thethunder92 as, “Plastic surgery is very bizarre. I think they’ll have to have something better than putting plastic in your body.”

u/Difficult-Secret-540 added, “It’s crazy to think that the best option we have right now is basically just stuffing plastic or fillers into people.”

4. Generational complaints about the newer generation

Kids never do it right, as expressed by u/Difficult-Sevret-540, “Our parents thought we were lazy and glued to screens, and now people say the same thing about Gen Z. In a few decades, today’s kids will be ranting about how their kids never put down their neural implants. It’s just the circle of life.”

Summing up the repeated pattern was u/jackfaire writing, “My peers and I used to mock how our parents would freak out about our generation. Now my generation does the same thing about our kids. When our kids have kids, I’m sure they’ll complain too.”

5. Non-self-driving cars

self-driving car, transportation, navigation, AI, driverless, government, accidental death, road trips
Smart self-driving car. Image via Canva – Photo by RyanKing999

We have to get a driver’s license today, but the future will probably all be driverless cars, as mentioned by u/pdeichler. “I think people in the future will think we were crazy to drive on our own due to the risk of accidents/death. Also, they’ll wonder what we did on long road trips since they won’t have to drive and can do whatever they want while riding in the car.”

Stating concern over governmental control and lack of freedom was u/Sorrysafarisanfran saying, “Everything will be preprogrammed and approval will be given based on social credit units.”

6. Social media obsession

social media, camera, trending videos, healthy relationships, friends, posts, viral video, YouTube, TikTok
A social media break on campus. Image via Canva – Photo by FatCamera

People not only watch, but also try to get famous, as stated by u/Attila-t-h-452-72, “Inflict Pain and do stupid stuff that is dangerous for likes…” They continued, “Albeit they are pretty funny and sometimes just stupid like the guy who went up in a self-made parachute (I think) during the last hurricane with a camera. I don’t think the future will think it was very smart or funny.”

U/OfTheAtom mentioned the world’s obsession with social media, “Obviously it’s truly a place of understanding and getting to know each other, but future generations may have a healthier relationship with the technology to extract the good things and leave the noise.”

The United States is a bit obsessed when it comes to social media. According to a 2025 article in Demandsage, the average time people spend on daily social media is 141 minutes. That’s down two minutes a day from the 143 minutes spent by people in 2024.

7. Using fossil fuels

fosil fuels, gas, petroleum, natural gas, chemistry, electricity, cars, heat, envirnoment
Using the gas pump at the gasoline station. Image via Canvau00a0- Photo by 89Stocker

“Burning natural gas for electricity; while having plenty of other tech to do the same thing. Natural gas is a marvelous feedstock for chemistry (you know things like fertilizers that feed the world), it’s far too much valuable, and limited, to be casually burn for heat and electricity,” added u/233C, thinking about the other more beneficial uses that are wasted.

8. Using chemical pesticides

pesticides, chemicals, poison control, poison, food resources, farming, agriculture, insects
Tractor spraying pesticides Image via Canva – Photo by Slatan

The amount of poison we use to manage our food resources is frightening, as mentioned u/tboy160, “Imagine soaking your lawn in chemicals, then having your kids and dogs play in the chemicals?!?”

A 2024 study in ScienceDirect found that communities close to agricultural areas had increased levels of pesticides in the dust around their homes. It’s another example of how our behaviors infiltrate and affect all aspects of our lives.

9. Capitalism

The system of self-promotion through working hard to achieve more was questioned by u/Mioraecian, who said, “People talk about the end of capitalism being workers’ unions and wealth equality, etc. I’ll know capitalism has truly ended when our approach to consumerism and packaging has changed.”

10. Thoughts about the future and this thread

The most common consensus among these ideas is that the future will be better. “If, however, we experience some sort of catastrophe that knocks society back to the dark ages, I would imagine future generations will look back and think all the first-world bs we argued about is ridiculous while they have to fight daily for shelter, food, and water,” u/Smoth-Like-Buttah expressed an interesting viewpoint.

It isn’t easy to know exactly what the future holds, but it’s also clear these folks have strong opinions about the present. Let’s hope that when we get there, the things that need the most change evolve, what works endures, and what can’t be improved teaches us how to move forward more wisely.

  • Woman documents her nephew’s late night culinary quests as the viral ‘Midnight Chef’
    Photo credit: @midnightchef_amir on InstagramAmir Jackson's late night cooking is going viral.
    ,

    Woman documents her nephew’s late night culinary quests as the viral ‘Midnight Chef’

    A 15-year-old cooking late night snacks is inspiring the Internet.

    One night in Apple Valley, California, Morgan Graham rose in the middle of the night. A smell had woken her up. It was pleasant, but at 11:28 p.m. she wasn’t expecting to smell delicious cooking. She went down into the kitchen to see her 15-year-old nephew, Amir Jackson, baking cookies.

    This was the first of several viral videos of Graham’s nephew cooking up a storm late at night. Jackson, who has been staying with his aunt during the summer, is taking advantage of her kitchen to whip up some sumptuous snacks.

    Birth of a Midnight Chef

    Nearly every night, Graham wakes up around midnight to the smell of cookies, cornbread, tacos, or whatever her nephew wants to prepare.

    “I don’t care,” said Graham in the initial video. “He’s very responsible. He’s not gonna burn the house down, so therefore, cook whatever you want.”

    Graham further explained in the video that Jackson looks at recipes daily. He also rummages through her pantry during the day to search for ingredients for his nightly cooking fest. 

    “In his world, he’s having the time of his life. In my world, I just want to stop waking up close to midnight to the smell of food,” Graham joked.

    Graham’s videos featuring her nephew have racked up millions of views on TikTok and Instagram. The commenters soon bestowed the nickname “Midnight Chef” upon Jackson, to general delight. In another video, Jackson explained he liked the peace and quiet of the night while preparing his dishes.

    “I was like, ‘Man, I could go for some cookies right now.’ I saw they had cookie dough, so I started just making them, just randomly,” Jackson told TODAY. “I was trying to make sure nobody was up. My thought process was just like, ‘Man, why not?’”

    Graham is encouraging her nephew to keep cooking even though it wakes her. In fact, Graham set up Jackson’s own Midnight Chef Instagram page for him to post his latest recipes.

    “I just want to experiment while I still got the chance to experiment. I’ll maybe like branch into different fields,” said Jackson. “Explore what I can do while I still got time to.”

    Why do we indulge in late night snacking?

    Jackson’s popularity has brought up a commonly asked question: Why do we crave food randomly in the middle of the night?

    Well, there’s actually a bit of science behind it. Turns out that late night snacking is a result of our circadian rhythm system. As part of our now-defunct survival mechanism, our ancestors would eat large meals at night to store energy in times of famine. This is also why most midnight snackers crave foods higher in fat, salt, and sugar compared to what they’d usually eat during the day. While there’s nothing inherently wrong with late night snacking, it could curb certain health goals if a person is trying to trim down.

    If you find yourself getting up in the middle of the night with a hankering for a snack, it may be worth taking a peek at Jackson’s videos. Who knows what kind of late night cooking it can inspire? Perhaps you’ll become a Midnight Chef yourself.

  • European Union enforces ban on destroying unsold fast-fashion clothing by major companies
    Photo credit: CanvaThe European Union hopes to reduce fast-fashion waste.

    A new rule adopted by the European Union is intended to reduce landfill waste while holding major clothing manufacturers accountable.

    Starting July 19, the EU prohibits large companies from destroying unsold clothing, accessories, and shoes under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). The regulations will expand to cover medium-sized companies in 2030.

    Fast fashion has become a major environmental concern. As retailers rapidly cycle through trends, unsold clothing often ends up in landfills or is destroyed to make room for new inventory. Many garments are made from synthetic fibers that can release greenhouse gases as they break down and shed microplastics that may contaminate soil and waterways.

    What’s the ban’s purpose?

    The ban is intended to reduce the amount of unsold clothing that large manufacturers dispose of. According to the European Environment Agency, between 264,000 and 594,000 tonnes of unused textiles are destroyed across Europe each year.

    Instead of destroying unsold clothing, companies will need to find other ways to keep those products in use. That could mean selling excess inventory at a discount, donating it to charities or social enterprises, or preparing it for reuse through repair, refurbishment, or remanufacturing. When those options aren’t feasible, the materials can be recycled.

    While the regulation is primarily focused on reducing the fashion industry’s environmental impact, the EU also hopes it will strengthen the economy by encouraging more sustainable business practices. The ban incentivizes companies to design products that are more resource-efficient, durable, reusable, and easier to repair or recycle. In turn, consumers should benefit from higher-quality products that last longer and generate less waste.

    Companies may destroy unsold clothing and footwear only in limited circumstances, such as when the items are damaged, unsafe, counterfeit, infringe intellectual property rights, or have been rejected by charitable organizations. Businesses relying on these exemptions must provide supporting documentation, such as test results or other records, to justify the destruction. Even then, they must follow the EU’s waste hierarchy, which prioritizes reuse and recycling over disposal. Companies are also required to publish annual reports detailing the unsold products they have discarded.

    National authorities will enforce the ban and may impose fines on companies that violate its requirements, including failing to maintain records for at least five years to support inspections. To help reduce the administrative burden, businesses may use existing customs and logistics codes when reporting the products they discard.

    Why recycling isn’t enough

    Recycling clothing can be a complicated and labor-intensive process. It often involves separating fabrics, dyes, synthetic fibers, and natural textile materials before they can be reused. That’s not to say it isn’t worthwhile. Instead of ending up in a landfill, recycled textiles can be turned into new clothing, home insulation, carpet padding, and other products.

    Still, recycling isn’t a cure-all. The EU hopes the new ban will encourage companies to keep usable clothing in circulation for as long as possible through resale, donation, reuse, or refurbishment before recycling becomes necessary. In doing so, the regulation aims to create a more circular economy rather than allowing piles of unused clothing to continue growing.

    This movement hopes to encourage clothing manufacturers to produce higher-quality products and reshape the industry as a whole. Making clothing from higher-grade materials with durable stitching that’s easier to repair can help reduce waste. While critics argue that doing so could reduce the number of garments sold each year, many say better-made clothing is worth the higher price—especially if consumers end up buying fewer replacement items over time.

    What can you do with old clothing?

    There are plenty of things you can do with old clothing around your home. If an item is too damaged to donate, its fabric can be repurposed for crafts or used as cleaning rags. And if you’re handy with a needle, there are countless ways to upcycle old clothes into new outfits, accessories, or other useful items with a little inspiration from the Internet.

    Giant corporations and everyday people alike can do their best to make the most of the materials they have, helping save money and reduce waste.

  • European Broadcasting Union offers guide to reduce sexualizing camera angles of Olympic women athletes
    Photo credit: CanvaA new guide has been introduced on how to respectfully broadcast woman athletes.

    Being an athlete is tough, especially if you’re an Olympian. They sacrifice their time and bodies in order to achieve peak physical condition. There is also the mental pressure to compete against the best. The last thing they should worry about is being objectified and sexualized online. 

    With this in mind, the European Broadcasting Union wants to help. They offered a booklet to broadcasters titled Raising the Bar: Guidelines for respectful media coverage in women’s athletics. The 23-page guide shows how camera placement choices and editing could potentially compromise an athlete. It also offers broadcasters guidelines for how to set up camera shots and show slow-motion replays that won’t sexualize or present athletes in undignified poses. 

    athletes, infographic, olympians, guide
    Screenshot

    Focusing on the sport, reducing harassment

    These guidelines come as multiple stories about women athletes being harassed online have surfaced. Many misogynistic posts about athletes have come from slow motion footage focused on certain parts of the athlete’s body. 

    “The sexualization of women athletes through selective camera angles and editing choices continues to be a significant concern across many sports broadcasts,” wrote Glen Killane, executive director of EBU Sport in the booklet. “Lingering shots on bodies, low-angle cameras that capture revealing views, and excessive slow-motion replays that serve no technical or storytelling purpose are among the issues observed in the media coverage of women’s athletics competitions today.”

    These new broadcast guidelines and suggestions are backed by Serbian long jumper Ivana Španović, British Olympic pole vaulter Holly Bradshaw, and Croatian high jumper Blanka Vlašić. Vlašić has spoken out regarding the equal visibility of women’s sports. Bradshaw has spoken out against the discomfort and sexualization of Olympic women athletes due to their tight-fitting uniforms.

    “I first-hand have received social media abuse and witnessed inappropriate videos online of myself and colleagues when slow motion content of us competing is captured,” wrote Bradshaw in the guide. “Athletes want to enjoy themselves doing the sport they love without feeling uncomfortable or anxious about the footage being shown live. Many athletes, myself included, have been in competitive scenarios where they are more focused on the cameras instead of their own performance.”

    What the guide provides

    The guide provides visual aids for broadcasters along with insights from the athletes to explain why certain shots would be preferred. Broadcasters are requested to avoid tight shots from the back of athletes. They’re also asked to avoid low camera angles from underneath. They recommend shots above the pelvis or ones that don’t linger onto commonly sexualized areas of the body. They recommend wider shots so the audience can see the technical ability being displayed by the athlete. Overall, the point is to focus on the athletic performance rather than close-ups of the athlete.

    Currently, there is no enforcement of these guidelines or penalties if a sports broadcast doesn’t adhere to them. However, there is value in knowing which broadcasts will focus on the athletic contests rather than an athlete’s appearance. This will help the competitors focus on how they do rather than how they look when the cameras are on.

Explore More Culture Stories

Fashion

European Union enforces ban on destroying unsold fast-fashion clothing by major companies

Film & TV

European Broadcasting Union offers guide to reduce sexualizing camera angles of Olympic women athletes

Culture

The summer concert state rankings: Which states pack more festivals, shows, and tours in 2026

Internet

The church fathers of early Christianity are showing their swag – on TikTok