In 2019, Sydney Stoner was 27 years old, just married, and had such immense stomach pain that she was collapsing at work. Doctors dismissed her concerns, saying that it was “that time of the month” or that she was too young for anything serious to happen to her. The pain had gotten so bad in 2020 that she lied to her doctor that she had blood in her stool, forcing them to refer her to a specialist and get a colonoscopy. That’s when they found the cancer.

When Stoner went in for the procedure, the doctors struggled to complete it as they found a five millimeter tumor blocking the pathway to her colon. At 27, she was diagnosed with Stage 4 bowel cancer, which had spread to her liver and lungs. The average woman doesn’t get regular colon cancer screenings until age 45. Had Stoner not lied to her primary care physician, she probably wouldn’t be here today.

“Doctors said I was too young but I probably would have died before I made it to the screening age of 45,” she told The Daily Mail. “It was very frustrating.”

According to University of California Davis and other sources, colorectal cancer is the number one cause of cancer death for men under 50 and number two for women in the same age range. In fact, people born between 1981 and 1996 for some reason have twice the risk of developing colorectal cancer than people born in 1950. Doctors and scientists haven’t found out exactly why there is an uptick in colorectal cancer diagnoses within younger people, but the fact that it’s become more common is true and troubling.

Stoner is one of the luckier younger people that got her diagnosis early enough that it wasn’t a death sentence. She was able to get the tumors growing in her colon and her liver surgically removed, and is considered stable after 23 rounds of chemotherapy. She is still lucky in that she is alive, however much of her recovery and healing would’ve been less intense had her doctors originally listened and she got treated correctly right away. Stoner has since encouraged others to argue and fight for their health.

scars, health advocacy, surgery, staples, operation
Stoner's torso after a successful surgery. Photo credit: @sydneystonershelton

“I know it’s difficult but keep advocating for yourself because no one else is going to get that done for you,” she said. “Find a new doctor, or whatever that may be. Find someone to listen to you because I know people that were diagnosed at 18 years old. The screening age needs to be lower or there shouldn’t be one at all.”

A 2022 poll found that 52% of patients felt “ignored, dismissed, or not believed” when seeking medical treatment from their physician. This is especially an ongoing issue with women like Stoner who have had their pain dismissed by physicians as period pain, menopause, or some other issue when it turned out to be a serious deadly disease. There is even a term for it called “medical gaslighting.”

If you don’t feel you’re being heard by your doctor, there are some ways to help further advocate for yourself and get the treatment you need. Bring a family member or partner with you to the doctor to help act as your “lawyer” to advocate for help and as a witness to your pain. Prepare yourself for each appointment with questions ready to ask and be prepared to be vulnerable with your doctor to really drive home what you’ve been experiencing. If you don’t agree with what your doctor is diagnosing and you feel like your concerns aren’t being heard, tell them that directly and ask for further clarification if you have further questions. If you’re not making progress after two to three visits, you could consider finding a new physician.

doctor's appointment, healthcare, health advocacy, medical treatment, medical care
Bringing a family member to your doctor's appointment could help you ensure that your needs are met. Photo credit: Canva

While it’s recommended to follow your doctor’s advice, it’s also important to speak out for yourself and advocate for proper care if something still doesn’t feel right.

This article originally appeared in May.

  • The conversations people avoid may be the ones they would enjoy the most 
    Photo credit: CanvaTwo women enjoy some small talk.

    Before having a conversation with a stranger, many people assume the interaction will be boring, uncomfortable, or simply not worth the effort. A recent study found that people routinely underestimate how enjoyable and meaningful these interactions can be.

    In a recent paper, “Conversations About Boring Topics Are More Interesting Than We Think,” researchers suggest one of the biggest obstacles to human connection may be our own expectations. Across nine experiments involving 1,800 participants, talking on topics people expected to be boring turned out to be far more engaging than they predicted.

    human connection, anxiety, relationship science, conversation skills
    A good conversation.
    Photo credit Canva

    People unknowingly avoid meaningful conversations with strangers

    Elizabeth Trinh, a doctoral student at the University of Michigan and lead study author, placed people in conversations about topics that they identified as boring. Options varied from the stock market to cats to vegan diets.

    The study asked participants to predict how a conversation with unfamiliar people might go. Most participants expected less enjoyment, less connection, and less value from the exchange. The results suggest that people are surprisingly poor at forecasting their own social experiences.

    After the interaction with a stranger, the majority believed it went far better and was more engaging than they had predicted. In an American Psychological Association press release, Trinh said, “People consistently expected conversations about seemingly boring topics to be less interesting than they turned out to be.”

    The study indicates people might place too much emphasis on the topic and situation itself. Because once people start actually talking, the content matters far less than the interaction. “What really drives enjoyment is engagement,” explained Trinh.

    “Feeling heard, responding to each other, and discovering unexpected details about someone’s life can make even a mundane topic meaningful,” she added.

    psychology, interpersonal perception, social interactions
    Co-workers enjoy a good conversation.
    Photo credit Canva

    People opt out of potential connections

    The study shows that people may be opting out of potential connections because they assume that opportunity isn’t worth their time and energy. It also challenges the idea that meaningful conversations require a special chemistry or a pre-existing relationship.

    Instead, ordinary interactions with neighbors, coworkers, or people standing in a line may offer more emotional value than once believed. “Even a brief conversation about everyday life may be more rewarding than we expect,” said Trinh.

    Researchers have repeatedly found that people feel better after engaging with strangers, even when expectations of awkwardness are high. They report feeling happier and more connected. Responding to another person, sharing experiences, and discovering unexpected connections far outweigh the importance of a strong starting point.

    An epidemic of loneliness

    These findings offer a reassuring contrast to the belief that modern loneliness is a growing problem that may not be easily solved. Avenues for connection may be far more abundant than many people think.

    Several proposed solutions to loneliness and social isolation involve building new friendships through social groups and new hobbies. But Trinh’s research suggests a far simpler approach. People may be surrounded by opportunities that they routinely dismiss. Most of us assume boring, small talk won’t go anywhere, yet even a brief chat with a coworker or stranger may offer more social value than people realize.

    The basic, everyday exchanges people have been avoiding might actually be some of the most valuable. Rather than planning the perfect social outing, a willingness to talk with a stranger that we might otherwise avoid could lead to a more meaningful experience.

  • Psychotherapist explains why Gen Z slang may be harder to decode than previous generations
    Photo credit: CanvaGen Z attached to their phones.

    Phrases like “that’s mid” or “no cap, sus” are common forms of slang used by Gen Z. Even when words might be technically familiar, conversations with teenagers can feel like there’s a real barrier to entry.

    According to Duygu Balan, a psychotherapist and mother of a teen, Gen Z slang is harder for many adults to decode because the language is emotionally layered and evolves rapidly online. In a recent story for Psychology Today, Balan explained that slang serves as a social signal separating one generation from the previous one, but digital culture has accelerated the process.

    emotional slang, digital language, social media slang, youth language
    A woman is confused at her computer.
    Photo credit Canva

    Slang evolving in real time

    Every age group develops informal language to signal belonging and shared cultural understanding. But the way slang spreads and functions today has changed dramatically.

    Digital platforms like TikTok, Instagram, Discord, YouTube, and Snapchat have language transforming in real time. A phrase can appear in a viral post, be remixed by thousands of users, and shift definition within days. By the time it navigates to general consumption, the meaning might have evolved again.

    Speed is only part of the story

    The way slang quickly changes is only part of the story. What makes Gen Z slang even harder to decode is that it often compresses emotional meaning into short phrases. These terms do more than describe something. They signal how it feels.

    In fast-moving digital environments, where attention spans are short and communication happens through texts and memes, this kind of conversation becomes incredibly efficient,” shared Balan.

    A 2024 study in Springer Nature Link explained that with shrinking attention spans and the evolution of reaction-based commentary, complex messages are conveyed through shorter expressions.

    Gen Z slang compresses emotional reactions

    Young people use digital shorthand to express emotion quickly. Social media relies on fast interpretation, and specific slang allows people to share tone, identity, and attitude instantly.

    Many of these phrases are used to compress complicated feelings such as discomfort, anxiety, longing, sadness, and skepticism into bite-sized constructs that can be communicated in seconds,” Balan adds.

    Irony plays a major role in Gen Z slang. Expressions can blur sincerity, making it difficult to tell what is meant literally and what is meant playfully. A phrase can carry real emotional weight framed as a joke, allowing the speaker to maintain distance.

    The phrase “brain rot” captures how it feels when the mind becomes overly stimulated. “Delulu” is short for delusional, and it’s a playful way to describe a person’s hopeful thinking. Another common slang term, “low-key,” allows someone to agree without fully committing.

    Trying to interpret these terms can take time and patience since context means so much with them.

    These phrases are not meant to be clearly translated, so they aren’t. They stem from experiences that someone who wasn’t born with an iPhone in their hand will never fully understand,” explains Balan.

    slang psychology, complex feelings, compressed ideas, social media
    Gen Z plays for the camera.
    Photo credit Canva

    Slang that signals peer approval

    Historically, slang remained consistent long enough for people outside a generation to eventually understand. Today’s slang is far more situational, shaped by online culture and social context. Words like “radical” once meant something was cool. Meanwhile, a term like “sick” not only signals it’s good, but also conveys social meaning, such as admiration from peers.

    This helps explain why adults often find Gen Z slang harder to decode. The challenge is not only vocabulary, but the combination of context, irony, emotional layering, and rapid evolution. Slang words now mean looking past the surface of the reference and paying more attention to the weight of the feelings underneath.

  • A Cornell study says smart people are less likely to hide behind corporate buzzwords
    Photo credit: CanvaA man meditates at the center of a work meeting.

    If you ever sat through a business meeting where someone calls out, “We need to circle back and socialize this cross-functionally,” and thought, “You could have just said let’s talk more before deciding anything,” congratulations: science is on your side.

    A new study from Cornell University suggests that people who are less impressed by corporate jargon may actually think more clearly and make better decisions. Cognitive psychologist Shane Littrel introduced something called a Corporate Bullshit Receptivity Scale (CBSR), which is exactly as amazing as it sounds.

    business meeting, leadership, critical thinkers
    A woman leading the business meeting is unimpressed.
    Photo credit Canva

    Strongest thinkers in the room

    The study, published in the Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, examined how workers responded to vague corporate language intended to sound impressive. The research revealed that people who rate jargon-heavy phrases as especially “profound” or “informative” also tended to score lower on analytical thinking and workplace decision making.

    In other words, the people most impressed by phrases like “all hands on deck” and “this is mission critical” probably aren’t the strongest thinkers in the room. Anyone who’s ever rolled their eyes during a meeting full of corporate buzzwords and thought, “This is nonsense,” the findings are validating.

    confusion, terminology, clarification, jargon
    A boring meeting.
    Photo credit Canva

    Why some people are impressed by buzzwords

    The CBSR scale was created to measure how easily people are impressed by polished but meaningless corporate language. In a story for the Cornell Chronicle, Littrell described this workplace talk as “a specific style of communication that uses confusing, abstract buzzwords in a functionally misleading way.” He added, “Unlike technical jargon, which can sometimes make office communication a little easier, corporate bullshit confuses rather than clarifies. It may sound impressive, but it is semantically empty.”

    What’s perhaps more troubling is that coworkers, the most susceptible to the BS, rated supervisors higher. They also reported improved job satisfaction and were more likely to spread it themselves. A reality that helps explain why this language survives.

    Every profession has terminology that serves a purpose. Doctors or engineers use specialized language because precision matters. However, language designed to sound strategic only makes the feebleminded happy, according to the study.

    frustration, translation, professionalism
    Receiving a frustrating email.
    Photo credit Canva

    The study validates relatable frustration

    The Cornell study validates a frustration that many workers have struggled with throughout their careers. People can tell the difference between someone trying to explain something and someone trying to sound important.

    A 2022 study in Springer Nature Link found that clarity improves comprehension. Experts who truly grasp a topic are far better at translating it. The people who communicate the most clearly are often those who understand what’s going on the best.

    The World Economic Forum shared a survey of 1,000 American workers, which found widespread irritation with corporate buzzwords. More than a quarter of the workers reported hearing corporate jargon every day. People generally found these interactions more annoying and less professional.

    celebrating, research, clarity, honesty
    Celebrating at work with a High 5.
    Photo credit Canva

    Potential benefits of implementing CBSR

    Implementing tools like CBSR may help companies recognize communication habits that aren’t working. It offers a measurable way to examine how incorporating shorthand speech affects decision-making. In theory, the scale could encourage workplaces to prioritize clarity over sounding impressive.

    If organizations become more aware of how often buzzwords replace direct communication, they can reduce misunderstandings while building trust between employees and leadership. Language influences the perception of leadership. When the critical thinkers secretly revolt over current expectations and practices, that’s probably a real problem.

    For people exhausted by an endless procession of buzzword-filled meetings, the research suggests that the annoyance probably comes from valuing plain English and practical thinking. Simply put, sometimes the smartest response is asking people to say what they really mean.

Explore More Civic Life Stories

Civic Life

Psychotherapist explains why Gen Z slang may be harder to decode than previous generations

Civic Life

A Cornell study says smart people are less likely to hide behind corporate buzzwords

Society

Teens aren’t as disengaged as you may think: What adults get wrong about adolescents’ civic contributions

Civic Life

17 everyday things we do now that the future will find utterly bizarre