GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 20
  • 3

Search and Destroy

  • Posted by: Patrick James , SeaShepard
  • on December 8, 2006 at 11:49 am

Last winter, the frigid waters of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary, an area of the Antarctic Ocean where whaling is strictly prohibited, were patrolled by the 180-foot, 657-ton ice-class Farley Mowat, flagship of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. In one daring encounter, the Mowat rammed a Japanese whaler and chased it from the sanctuary. This year, the Mowat and a second ship, the Robert Hunter, have embarked on Operation Leviathan, to once again prevent a Japanese whaling fleet from hunting and killing whales (ostensibly for scientific research) in those same protected waters. “Our objective,” explains Paul Watson, the 56-year-old SSCS founder and Greenpeace co-founder, “is not to get there, hold up banners and say, ‘Oh please, please stop whaling.’ Our objective is to shut them down by physically blocking and intervening.”

Operation Leviathan is the latest in a long line of SSCS campaigns wherein the anti-whaling activists do everything in their power to prevent the illegal hunting of whales in protected waters. Their tactics range from putting themselves between the hunters and the whales, to physically jamming whalers’ propellers with debris. If all else fails, SSCS ships will ram the offending vessel. Since 1979, the SSCS has taken 215 voyages, during which time it has also sabotaged and sunk 11 unoccupied docked whaling ships.

Actions such as these have resulted in awards and accolades for the SSCS, but the organization has also garnered serious criticism from the Japanese whaling industry and members of the International Whaling Commission, who have equated SSCS policies with terrorism. But Watson, who left Greenpeace in 1977 when he felt that bureaucracy was hampering the work, insists that the brazen tactics of the SSCS are supported by the 1982 U.N. World Charter for Nature, which permits individual enforcement of international conservation laws. “The fact is that we don’t break laws, we uphold them,” Watson says, “and we will never abandon our campaigns.”

LEARN MORE seashepherd.org

  • Filed under: Magazine : Look
  • Categories: Environment
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 3 Comments
    • Posted by: jdmcmillan
    • on December 12, 2006 at 6:21 pm

    Here is the text for the 1982 U.N. World Charter for Nature:
    http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/37/a37r007.htm

    Looks like “individual enforcement of international conservation laws” is referring specifically to Section 21e. Interesting stuff – hadn’t heard about this charter before.

    • Posted by: Applegate
    • on February 19, 2007 at 3:09 pm

    A Japanese whaler sent a Mayday about two weeks ago after a similar, non-lethal situation like the above [they were provided supplies after being rammed]. Upon hearing it, I imagined kids policing themselves on the schoolyard; it doesn’t work well for long.

    How long before the Japanese harpoon the SSCS ships I wonder? Wouldn’t it be just as effective and less instigating to create a noise that chases whales away? Just as much effort/fuel/people without the violent encounters. I’m confused about how sinking unmanned private property is okay – doesn’t that create an ecological mess after rust and leaked oil?

    • Posted by: Anonymous
    • on December 21, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    they are just terrorists

Login or Sign up to discuss this article

About The Contributors

  • Patrick James

    Patrick James

    In the future, I think I'd like to be a teacher.

     
  • Sea Shepard Conservation Society

    SeaShepard

     

Recent Readers

  • Tali Catz
  • Beth Stone
  • Lindsay Perkins
  • Jay J. Ku
  • Price
  • Amrit
  • Roni Octafian
  • kelseyp
  • Will Etling
  • brian dionisi
  • pewells
  • teapock
See all

Related Content

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    It's Official: Sea Shepherd Is Successfully Thwarting Japanese Whaling

    Congratulations are in order. The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (which we covered back in GOOD ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Futuristic Stealth Boat Will Fight Whale Hunters

    You are looking at a picture of Earthrace, a new high-tech ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Pirate-Hunting TV Show: Genius or Totally Shameless?

    This pirate-hunting business is heating up. Emphasis on the word "business," too. After a few decades ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Mister Splashy Pants

    So Greenpeace is having people vote to name rescued humpback whales. More than 11,000 possible whale names were submitted but ...
    Read & Discuss

  • General : The Community Board

    The EPA Closes Its Libraries, Destroys Documents

    http://ucsaction.org/campaign/1_17_07epalibraryclosuresThe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun closing its nationwide network of scientific libraries, effectively preventing EPA scientists and the ...
    Read & Discuss

This Week In Magazine

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  2. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  3. The GOOD Guide to COP15: An Introduction
  4. The Kids Are All Right
  5. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  6. Picture Show: Breach
  7. LOOK: On the Road with Ethos Alliance
  8. Transparency: How Education Spending Affects Graduation Rates
  9. Action, In Words and Pictures
  10. Transparency: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch
  1. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  2. Picture Show: Breach
  3. The GOOD Guide to COP15: An Introduction
  4. The Kids Are All Right
  5. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  6. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  7. Transparency: The Change in Carbon Emissions
  8. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Treaty
  9. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Players
  10. Action, In Words and Pictures

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata