Do you feel like you're barely keeping your head above water as the tide of emails in your inbox rises? Follow these ten rules.
Do you feel like you're barely keeping your head above water as the tide of emails in your inbox rises? You're not alone.
<p> Back on June 9, TED curator Chris Anderson <a href="http://tedchris.posterous.com/help-create-an-email-charter">took to his blog</a> to complain that simply dealing with incoming messages can consume the better part of a work week. The problem, Anderson says, lies in the disconnect between email sender and recipient—it's easy to hit reply-all, drop in some mindless links, and copy-paste loads of text, but it's time consuming to actually parse through all of that information on the receiving end. Every time we shoot off a quick email, we don't always keep in mind that our friends and family are in for a not-so-quick read.</p><p> To address the problem, Anderson is advancing new rules of etiquette and protocol for email. His ten-point <a href="http://emailcharter.org/">Email Charter</a> includes guidelines like cutting out unnecessary attachments (logos, e.g.) and avoiding asking open-ended questions. It also includes one of my favorite innovations in email courtesy: the acronym NNTR, "no need to respond," which is just a nice way of letting the recipient know that they aren't obligated to write you back. It saves everyone time.</p><p> I fully support this idea. Email communication is more efficient than the post, but it's much less efficient, and more distracting, than it has the potential to be. And because emails are so easy to compose, we send way more of them than we do printed letters. There are <a href="http://www.spring.org.uk/2010/09/emails-dark-side-10-psychology-studies.php">plenty of studies</a> out there that illustrate just how much time and mental energy email eats up. </p><p> Here's the full charter. You can sign on and share it with all your contacts <a href="http://emailcharter.org/">here</a>—a move that may contribute to clogging inboxes in the short term, but will hopefully ease the burden for the long haul. Still, I can't help but wonder how many distracting emails are just links to hour-long TED talks.</p><blockquote> <p> 1. Respect Recipients' Time<br/> This is the fundamental rule. As the message sender, the onus is on YOU to minimize the time your email will take to process. Even if it means taking more time at your end before sending.<br/></p> <p> 2. Short or Slow is not Rude<br/> Let's mutually agree to cut each other some slack. Given the email load we're all facing, it's OK if replies take a while coming and if they don't give detailed responses to all your questions. No one wants to come over as brusque, so please don't take it personally. We just want our lives back!<br/></p> <p> 3. Celebrate Clarity<br/> Start with a subject line that clearly labels the topic, and maybe includes a status category [Info], [Action], [Time Sens] [Low Priority]. Use crisp, muddle-free sentences. If the email has to be longer than five sentences, make sure the first provides the basic reason for writing. Avoid strange fonts and colors.<br/></p> <p> 4. Quash Open-Ended Questions<br/> It is asking a lot to send someone an email with four long paragraphs of turgid text followed by "Thoughts?". Even well-intended-but-open questions like "How can I help?" may not be that helpful. Email generosity requires simplifying, easy-to-answer questions. "Can I help best by a) calling b) visiting or c) staying right out of it?!"<br/></p> <p> 5. Slash Surplus cc's<br/> cc's are like mating bunnies. For every recipient you add, you are dramatically multiplying total response time. Not to be done lightly! When there are multiple recipients, please don't default to 'Reply All'. Maybe you only need to cc a couple of people on the original thread. Or none.<br/></p> <p> 6. Tighten the Thread<br/> Some emails depend for their meaning on context. Which means it's usually right to include the thread being responded to. But it's rare that a thread should extend to more than 3 emails. Before sending, cut what's not relevant. Or consider making a phone call instead.<br/></p> <p> 7. Attack Attachments<br/> Don't use graphics files as logos or signatures that appear as attachments. Time is wasted trying to see if there's something to open. Even worse is sending text as an attachment when it could have been included in the body of the email.<br/></p> <p> 8. Give these Gifts: EOM NNTR<br/> If your email message can be expressed in half a dozen words, just put it in the subject line, followed by EOM (= End of Message). This saves the recipient having to actually open the message. Ending a note with "No need to respond" or NNTR, is a wonderful act of generosity. Many acronyms confuse as much as help, but these two are golden and deserve wide adoption.<br/></p> <p> 9. Cut Contentless Responses<br/> You don't need to reply to every email, especially not those that are themselves clear responses. An email saying "Thanks for your note. I'm in." does not need you to reply "Great." That just cost someone another 30 seconds.<br/></p> <p> 10. Disconnect!<br/> If we all agreed to spend less time doing email, we'd all get less email! Consider calendaring half-days at work where you can't go online. Or a commitment to email-free weekends. Or an 'auto-response' that references this charter. And don't forget to smell the roses.<br/></p>\n</blockquote><p> <em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/uzvards/2481348414/in/photostream/">Photo</a> (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/">cc</a>) from Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/uzvards/">uzvards</a></em></p>
Keep Reading Show less