Nuclear weapons are among the most devastating weapons ever created, with the potential to wipe out human civilization in a single strike. According to the UN, the risk of nuclear conflict is now higher than it has been in decades. Experts are increasingly asking: What would happen if nuclear war broke out today? The Future of Life Institute (@futureoflifeinstitute) recently shared a chilling 3D-simulated YouTube video illustrating the catastrophic aftermath of such a scenario, and it’s leaving viewers deeply unsettled.

Representative Image Source: Pexels | Asim Razan
Representative Image Source: Pexels | Asim Razan

According to their YouTube description, The Future of Life Institute (FLI) is a nonprofit focused on reducing catastrophic risks posed by advanced technologies like AI, biotechnology, and nuclear weapons. In this video, they depict a terrifying scenario: a nuclear war between Russia and the U.S. The simulation uses computer models to illustrate the devastating, post-apocalyptic consequences of such a conflict.


via GIPHY


“When one side fires a nuclear missile and the other side detects them and fires back before impact,” the narrator explains in the video. He then goes on to describe an example in case the US submarine would launch ballistic missiles from the west of Norway. These missiles would start striking Russia after about 10 minutes. Then the Russians from the north of Canada would start hitting the US a few minutes later. The video continues to demonstrate that the very first strikes would be high-altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) attacks, frying electronics and power grids, creating an electromagnetic pulse of tens of thousands of volts per meter. “Each impact creates a fireball about as hot as the core of the Sun,” the narrator reveals, and adds that it is “followed by a radioactive storm cloud.”

Representative Image Source: Pexels | Pixabay
Representative Image Source: Pexels | Pixabay

These intense explosions would vaporize people nearby. Fires would erupt. The fire would prompt the formation of a blastwave that would spread and damage buildings. Glass skyscrapers would melt and everything made of asphalt would turn into flammable hot liquid. But this isn’t the worst part. According to the video, the worst part is “nuclear winter,” which is caused by the black carbon smoke from nuclear firestorms. The firestorms usually spew plumes of black smoke up into the stratosphere far above any rain clouds that could wash out the smoke. High-altitude jet streams are so fast that it would take only a few days for the smoke to spread across much of the northern hemisphere.


via GIPHY


As a result, the Earth would become freezing-cold, and the smoke would block out the Sun, causing a total collapse of life on the planet. “It [nuclear war] has no winners, only losers,” the narrator says, concluding the video. 


via GIPHY


Pran Nath, a professor from Northeastern University told Northeastern News that the aftermath of a nuclear war has three stages. “When the nuclear blast occurs, because of the chain reaction, in a very short period, a lot of energy and radiation is emitted,” Nath says. “In the first instance, a huge flash occurs, which is the nuclear reaction producing gamma rays. If you are exposed to it, people, for example, in Hiroshima were essentially evaporated, leaving shadows.” The second phase is a shockwave and heat blast or a fireball that would travel around the speed of sound, around 760 miles per hour. The third phase is the fallout in which the mushroom cloud is created, as also explained by the video above.

Representative Image Source: 7th August 1945: Aerial view of Hiroshima the day after the United States dropped the atomic bomb on it during World War II, Japan. (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
Representative Image Source: 7th August 1945: Aerial view of Hiroshima the day after the United States dropped the atomic bomb on it during World War II, Japan. (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

“We can and must, however, do everything we can to avoid nuclear war. The effects are too likely to be globally catastrophic,” proclaimed Assistant Professor Cheryl Harrison from LSU Department of Oceanography & Coastal Sciences in a 2022 study about the effects of nuclear war. She described that not just the buildings or the people, a nuclear war would put an end to the life in oceans as well, eating up algae and hence, destroying marine life forever. It would be the next “Nuclear Little Ice Age,” as per the LSU study. 


via GIPHY



https://youtube.com/watch?v=-xthzy1PxTA%3Fsi%3DFcLAV7Gv1KILtldz

  • Kenyan teens create award-winning, affordable car exhaust filters made with corn cobs and algae
    Photo credit: @theearthprize on Instagram/CanvaTwo 17-year-olds made a device that is helping reduce air pollution in Kenya.

    When Fredrick Njoroge Kariuki of Kenya turned 12 in 2021, he experienced incredible difficulty breathing. Doctors diagnosed him with bronchitis, explaining that his coughing and breathing issues were connected to the thick layers of exhaust fumes emitted by vehicles in the area. Five years later, the teenager teamed up with his classmate Miron Onsarigo to create an award-winning, inexpensive filter made with agricultural waste.

    While air pollution is a global concern, it is particularly an issue in Kenya. A 2024 study found that Nairobi, Kenya’s capital, had 3.7 times higher levels of particulate air pollution than the World Health Organization’s guidelines. This doesn’t just contribute to illness like Kariuki’s bronchitis. Experts estimate that the country’s air pollution is responsible for 400 to 1,400 premature deaths in Nairobi each year.

    The global environment issue was personal

    Both teens were hardened in their resolve to tackle this air pollution problem largely caused by the matatus (shared minibuses) and boda bodas (motorcycle taxis) common in urban areas.

    “The problem of air pollution was very personal to us, and that is why we started thinking about coming up with a solution,” Kariuki told Mongabay. “It was a passion before it became a project.”

    “I did not choose this problem. It chose me,” Kariuki said to Daily Nation. “Growing up in Naivasha, my bronchitis got so bad that I stopped thinking of air pollution as an environmental issue and saw it as something being committed against us.”

    “Seeing people get sick as a result of fumes from vehicles has become normal back home in Kisumu County. The ‘normal’ did not feel right to me. I wanted to do something about it,” added Onsarigo.

    Using waste products to clean the air

    With time, intelligence, and hard work, Kariuki and Onsarigo created the HewaSafi vehicle exhaust filter. The HewaSafi, which means “clean air” in Swahili, was made using locally sourced agricultural waste. The entire mechanism is made from steel mesh, copper, corn cobs, coconut shells, recycled batteries, and algae. All of these components help further filter out particles in the air straight from the exhaust pipe.

    The results of the HewaSafi were impressive. The device reduced particulate matter in the air by 93.3%. The HewaSafi also reduced carbon monoxide by 42% and absorbed 21.4% of CO2 that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere.

    Since the device was made using waste products, the HewaSafi manufacturing cost is around $126. By comparison, conventional filters of this sort typically cost around $390. So, not only is this filter effective, it’s cheap enough for more people to use.

    @urbanbetternairobi

    You breathe it every day. But how often do you think about it? Air pollution affects where we live, how we move, and who gets left behind. This Air Quality Awareness Week, swipe to see how Nairobi communities are taking action!#AirQualityAwarenessWeek #Cityzens #Cityzens4CleanAir #CleanAirNairobi #nairobi

    ♬ LET ME BE – The Second Voice

    A prize that leads to further opportunity

    The ingenuity of these two 17-year-olds won them the 2026 Earth Prize for Africa. They received $12,500 for their regional win and global attention to the HewaSafi.

    The teens hope to use the prize money and attention to further develop the HewaSafi. Using connections made through the Earth Prize, they aim to start a full line of emission control products. While they want to work with people with different budgets, their main target is to specifically cater HewaSafi filters toward public transportation vehicles.

  • The drawer problem: Why so many of us can’t let go of our old electronics, and what we can do about it
    Photo credit: Peter Dazeley/Photodisc via Getty ImagesThis look familiar?

    Think about the last smartphone, tablet or smartwatch you stopped using. Odds are it is not in a recycling bin or a new owner’s hands; it is sitting in a drawer.

    From our survey of 4,000 American consumers, we found the single most common thing people did with a device they were finished with was nothing at all: 39% simply stored it. Recycling and reselling, outcomes better for the environment, each accounted for only about 1 in 10 devices. Throwing devices in the trash claimed another 9%.

    What people do with old electronics

    Funded by the National Science Foundation, our multidisciplinary team blended our expertise in causal inferencesustainability and cybersecurity, to work on the tangled question of what people do with their consumer electronics when they’re done using them. We used statistical models to connect what people say – that is, their stated knowledge and attitudes – to what they actually did.

    Why the drawer wins

    Two main forces keep devices in the drawer. The first is anxiety about data. People who worried that recycling or reselling a device would compromise their data were 14% and 9% more likely to store it instead.

    The second force is simply not knowing how to. People who did not know where to recycle were 10% more likely to hold onto a device, and many also kept old gadgets as a perceived data backup.

    Recycling and reselling electronics are a lot easier than a lot of people think. In the U.S., the national chain Best Buy accepts devices for recycling; reselling online is convenient with vendors such as Back Market and Gazelle.

    Just be sure to wipe data before parting with a phone or computer. Also, remove the device from your account, for instance with Apple or Android. Unless you do, the device stays locked to you, and no one else can use it.

    We also compared what people intended to do with what they had actually done. This led to a telling detail: Data security worries led to people storing devices at a greater rate than they said they intended to.

    In other words, the fear of leaking personal data kicks in only when someone is facing the real decision of whether to hand off their device to a recycler or secondhand buyer.

    Getting at why people don’t recycle

    Researchers have long studied why people do or don’t recycle electronics: Convenience, awareness and incentives showed up as affecting the decision. But prior work examined recycling as the only option.

    Instead of considering the issue as a yes-or-no vote on recycling, we treat it as a comparison between different options: Storing, reselling, donating, trading in, recycling and throwing away the device in the trash. When modeling this way, trade-offs became visible.

    Knowing where to recycle, for instance, made recycling 47% more likely, but it also pulled people away from reselling, which is often the more environmentally friendly choice. You can explore the survey results in our interactive dashboards.

    Getting people to let go

    Storage is the worst of both worlds: A device sitting unused for years loses its resale value, and erasing its data only gets harder over time. The good news is that the main barriers – data concerns and not knowing where to turn – can be addressed with better information.

    We are experimenting with information interventions that walk people through their options, including how to securely wipe their data. We are testing nudges with randomized, controlled trials to test what leads people to give their old electronics a second life.

    It might be a good time to remember what old devices you’re holding onto and revisit your reasons for not letting go of them.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

  • Solar-powered boat feasts on trash and could solve the ocean’s plastic waste problem
    Photo credit: Ocean Cleanup on YouTubeThe Interceptor boat-barge could significantly clean our waters.

    Our oceans have a plastic problem. While it’s difficult to put a 100% accurate number on it, scientists estimated about 4.8 to 12.7 million metric tons of plastic waste entered the ocean in 2010 alone according to the journal Science. This issue has caused scientists and engineers to create a boat-barge in Los Angeles that skims the oceans to gobble up the plastic we leave behind.

    Devised by the non-profit Ocean Cleanup organization, the garbage-gulping Interceptor boat-barge is actually a smaller platform nestled within a larger boat. A floating barrier moves collected trash into the device onto a conveyor belt. An automatic shuttle then collects the trash from the conveyor to send it to a separate barge where there are six dumpsters to hold it. The solar-powered system can hold up to 20,000 lbs. of garbage. The trash is then separated into different categories (plastics, metal, etc.) so they can be disposed of responsibly.

    Catching ocean trash from the source

    Ocean Cleanup hopes to make a dent cleaning the Great Pacific Garbage Patch in the Pacific Ocean. However, they decided to first attack the plastic ocean problem at its source: rivers. When it rains, a lot of trash from the hills and valleys washes down into the nearest river. While there is significant ocean trash taken from beaches, they have found that the lion’s share of garbage that floats into our oceans actually comes from rivers and tributaries that lead into it. Essentially, the plan is to get ocean trash before it even enters the ocean.

    “We have to turn the faucet off before we can scoop the ocean, or else all we’re doing is taking out legacy trash to replace it with new trash,” James Patterson, the operations manager of Ocean Cleanup said to The Guardian. “Before you can clean out the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, you really need to turn off the source.”

    How the Interceptor is helping Los Angeles and beyond

    There is an Interceptor already doing its work at the mouth of Ballona Creek in Culver City, California. Since 2025, the Interceptor has prevented 143,710 lbs. of trash from entering the ocean via the creek. As a bonus, the Interceptor’s trash sweeping has lowered government budgets for beach grooming. Since there is less trash, the beach doesn’t need to be cleaned as often.

    There are two more Interceptors planned to be at the mouths of the San Gabriel River and the Los Angeles River. This can help clean up the rivers for the upcoming 2028 Summer Olympics for aquatic events.

    There are currently 21 Interceptor systems throughout the globe. Countries using them include Indonesia, Vietnam, Jamaica, Guatemala, the Dominican Republic, and Malaysia.

    If this is an issue that speaks to you, you can help even if you don’t live near an ocean. There may be a nearby river or creek that could benefit from volunteer cleanups. Do some research to find an organization near you to volunteer. If you can’t locate one, groups like River Cleanup can help you organize your own group. Much like how a small drop contributes to a large ocean, a small pick-up can make a big difference.

Explore More Environment Stories

Environment

Kenyan teens create award-winning, affordable car exhaust filters made with corn cobs and algae

Science

The drawer problem: Why so many of us can’t let go of our old electronics, and what we can do about it

Environment

Solar-powered boat feasts on trash and could solve the ocean’s plastic waste problem

Environment

As climate change causes flooding in London, experts found an effective, low-cost solution: beavers