Wim Hof, a 57-year-old who goes by the nickname “The Iceman,” holds 20 Guinness World Records for withstanding extreme temperatures. He’s run barefoot marathons in snow, dunked himself naked in freezing lakes, and climbed Mount Kiliminjaro dressed only in shorts. Today, he instructs classes in the Wim Hof Method to students like surfer Laird Hamilton, claiming that exposure to cold, meditation, and special breathing techniques can essentially hack our immune and nervous systems, shedding pounds and improving health and energy.

A few years ago, investigative journalist Scott Carney flew to Poland to meet Hof, planning to expose him as a charlatan or madman in a piece for Playboy. “He seemed to be claiming superpowers,” recalls Carney. “Like conquering the world’s tallest mountains with no cold-weather gear, controlling his body temperature and immune system at will. I’d built my career debunking men like him.”


[quote position=”left” is_quote=”true”]Our lifestyles are just too antiseptic and comfortable now.[/quote]

Instead, Carney says that he dug into the science driving Hof’s health claims and found that he was the real deal, zeroing in on simple but profound techniques that allow us to turn the extremes of our environment to condition our bodies and renew our lost evolutionary strength. After meeting Hoff, Carney says, “I hiked to the summit of Mt. Kilimanjaro without a shirt. I sat on the snowy bank of a river until the ice melted around me.”

After turning his experience into the book What Doesn’t Kill Us: How Freezing Water, Extreme Altitude and Environmental Conditioning Will Renew Our Lost Evolutionary Strength, out this month from Rodale Books, Carney spoke to GOOD about just how healthy it is to go extreme.

In 2013, you first flew to Poland to meet Wim Hof as a skeptic. Can you tell us about those early days?

I was living in Long Beach, California, had a belly paunch, backaches, and thought my days of youthful adventure were fading fast. Then I saw a picture of a nearly naked man sitting on a glacier. I thought maybe Hof had some very special physical abilities—perhaps genetically bestowed—to be able to endure the ice. But when he started suggesting he could teach people the same techniques, I was wary. I didn’t go to meet him with the intention of changing my health. I went to expose him as a charlatan. But instead I learned that his techniques are teachable, and that he has unlocked some ways for us to use the environment to stimulate our innate immune system.

In your book, you talk about the scientists who have studied Hof’s abilities. What did they find out?

In 2007, at the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research on Long Island, Hof was studied by Kenneth Kamler, a doctor who has worked on Everest. Hof was connected to heart and blood monitors and immersed in ice. Hof stayed in the ice for 72 minutes. His heart rate went down to 35 beats per minute. His breathing slowed down to once every few minutes. His core temperature initially declined a few degrees, but then rose again. Later, Peter Pickkers, a research scientist at Radboud University Medical Center in the Netherlands administered a harmless toxin (one made by the common E. coli bacteria found in our gut) to Hof. Ninety-nine percent of healthy people react with flulike symptoms to the toxin before their body realizes it is actually not harmful. Hof did not react with flulike symptoms, he had only minor headaches. Blood drawn while he was meditating remained resistant to the toxin for six days after it had left his body.

You point out that Hof might have unique abilities, perhaps some of them genetically bestowed.

Hof’s ability to withstand long exposure to cold might be partly due to the fact he has larger than usual amounts of heat-generating brown fat. His identical twin brother André also has the same high amount. They were both studied by scientists in the Netherlands.

But he was actually able to train volunteers to regulate their immune systems, right?

Yes, he trained twelve healthy volunteers in his method. They received injection of the toxin, and the trained volunteers were able to keep the body’s reaction at a far lower level than their untrained counterparts. An anti-inflammatory molecule called interleukin-10 increased more rapidly in the trained volunteers, while inflammatory molecules were lower.

How would you describe your health today, after learning Hof’s method?

I can’t claim that what I’ve experienced will apply to anyone but me, but my metabolism has changed pretty radically. I used to wear size 36 pants and now I wear size 31. I was given a treadmill test by Rob Pickels of the CU Sports Medicine and Performance Center in Boulder, Colorado. My bloodwork showed that when I exercise, I burn fat, not carbohydrates. I’ve added the equivalent of seven hours of exercise to my weekly routine, but actually my total exercise is about three hours a week. I was always afflicted by painful mouth canker sores, since I was a kid. After using Wim’s cold-exposure techniques, I haven’t gotten a single canker sore. That’s a small thing, but I’ve met people who have reversed rheumatoid arthritis or Crohn’s disease using his approach.

What is the scientific explanation for all of this?

We have this underlying biology that’s very adaptable and survival-oriented, but these days we are cocooned in comfort and we don’t activate it. So we’ve broken our fundamental biological links to the world around us. Indoor plumbing, heating systems, grocery stores, cars, and electric lighting now let us control our environment so thoroughly that we can live in perpetual homeostasis. But we evolved differently. We evolved to survive variations in our environment.

[quote position=”right” is_quote=”true”]In one study, overweight diabetic men were put into a cold room and their insulin resistance improved.[/quote]

Think of our ancestors who mounted expeditions across frozen mountains and parched deserts with only a whisper of technology to aid them. Simply reintroducing some common environmental stressors can bring back some of our lost evolutionary vigor. There’s a hidden biology we can tap into. We need environmental and physical variations that invigorate our nervous systems. We are living today with an evolutionary mismatch. Ray Cronise, a former NASA scientist, says we’re overlit, overfed and overstimulated.

What does cold do for us?

First, it activates and increases your brown fat (BAT). BAT is a type of fat that the body uses to generate heat. So brown fat boosts our metabolism and burns calories. It stimulates your body to generate more muscle mitochondria, the energy powerhouses inside your cells. In one study, overweight diabetic men were put into a cold room and their insulin resistance improved.

Why would someone’s immune system improve?

We don’t have all the science yet, but I can speculate that it’s because your nervous and immune systems are connected. That’s been proven scientifically, and we also know it from the simple fact that when you’re in better spirits it’s harder to get sick. But if you’re depressed and stressed you’re likelier to come down with a cold. The way I look at it, our lifestyles are just too antiseptic and comfortable now. These cold showers and strenuous breathing techniques essentially give our immune system something to occupy it so it doesn’t turn on itself.

[quote position=”full” is_quote=”true”]You have to realize that your fear around this momentary discomfort—a discomfort that will definitely be there—is mostly in your mind.[/quote]

What is your routine these days?

I do his deep-breathing routine for 15 minutes every morning. The technique is outlined in my book, but it involves multiple rapid breaths followed by breath retention. I do 50 pushups while holding my breath. When I get in the shower, I expose myself to one minute of cold water at the end. The intensive cold shower or ice water activates your nervous system immediately. I keep the temperature of my home in the low 60’s. Just keeping the temperature of your home low is like doing a low-grade workout all the time. Your body has to work a little to keep warm. You can actually lose weight by dialing your thermostat down like that. And I run outside shirtless two or three times a week, no matter the temperature.

How did it feel climbing Mt. Kilimanjaro in shorts?

It was awesome and exhausting, but very liberating. The interesting part is not being shirtless. The interesting thing is the speed at which we did it, which was five times faster than the normal ascent. We did it in only 28 hours. Usually people go slowly because they have to acclimate to the altitude change. The peak is around 18,000 feet. Forty percent of climbers fail because of acute mountain sickness. In fact, some mountaineers called our climb a suicide mission. But the key was that we compensated with Wim’s breathing method. His method increases the rate of respiration and adds more oxygen to your tissues, and we did the breathing technique long before we had to. So we had enough oxygen in our systems to quickly climb. If you apply that concept to regular exercise, you want to breathe heavily before you get to the maximum exertion, before you feel you have to catch your breath.

In your book you say, “I don’t like to suffer. Nor do I particularly want to be cold, wet, or hungry. If I had a spirit animal it would probably be a jellyfish floating in an ocean of perpetual comfort.” Most of us are like you. What do you say to those who’d like to feel healthier, but shiver at the mere thought of getting icy water?

You have to realize that your fear around this momentary discomfort—a discomfort that will definitely be there—is mostly in your mind. If you’ve gone through your whole life and never been exposed to big temperature variations, then experiencing cold is going to be like going to the gym your first time. Of course it’ll hurt—I’m not going to sugar coat that for people.

But what’s exciting is that you’re suddenly opening your body to a new type of experience, and you will see very rapid changes in your physiology. Pretty quickly you’ll start to feel euphoria as you release all these hormones like cortisol and norepinephrine. It’s like a runner’s high. It’s a natural response.

What’s your final takeaway?

No environmental extreme induces as many beneficial changes in human physiology as the cold does. Use it.

  • We paid college students about $5 a night to sleep at least 7 hours – and their grades quickly improved
    Photo credit: iStock via Getty Images Plus – Half of surveyed college students said they go to bed after 1 a.m., on average.
    ,

    We paid college students about $5 a night to sleep at least 7 hours – and their grades quickly improved

    A university experiment tested whether small, immediate rewards could help students follow through on their intentions to get more rest.

    Paying college students about US$5 a night to sleep seven hours got them a quarter more nights of adequate sleep – and better grades.

    That is what we found in a study we published in July 2026.

    We gave more than 1,100 undergraduates at University of Pittsburgh a Fitbit – a wearable activity tracker that looks similar to a watch – and an app that sent bedtime reminders and morning feedback. We randomly chose 468 students and paid them about $5 for every night they slept at least seven hours, over the course of four weeks. We verified how much they slept using the device they wore.

    The students were about 19 years old, on average, and half of them were first-year students. Roughly 72% of them were women. About 55% were white, 28% Asian, 9% Black and 4% Hispanic.

    Our study shows that offering an immediate financial reward can help students meet a seven-hour sleep goal, and that those effects can persist up to a month beyond when the students are paid.

    Not just a student problem

    About one-third of American adults sleep less than seven hours a night, and a similar share say they wish they slept more. Among adolescents and young adults, roughly two-thirds routinely fall short of getting seven hours of sleep a night – the amount of shut-eye that health authorities recommend.

    One prominent sleep researcher has called sleep deprivation the most prevalent high-risk behavior.

    Short sleep is linked to obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke and early death.

    Irregular sleep predicts mortality risk even more than sleep duration does. Sleep loss shows up in decision-making, even when it comes to issues like whether people vote.

    Students are running on empty

    Before we changed anything, the average student in our study slept 6.6 hours a night.

    Half were going to bed after 1 a.m. on average – a quarter after 2 a.m.

    Students got the recommended seven hours of sleep on a typical weeknight on only 43% of their nights, and more than 85% fell short at least once a week.

    They also did not know how much sleep they were getting. Two-thirds told us they usually slept seven hours – the trackers showed only about one-third of students slept that much on even three nights out of five.

    And 94% said their ideal night of sleep was longer than the one they were getting.

    What the money bought

    The 468 students we offered nightly payments reached seven hours of sleep on 26% more nights than 380 students who were not offered the money. That is a large shift for a group in which fewer than half were hitting the mark to begin with.

    Students receiving the monetary incentive slept 19 more minutes per school night, roughly the difference between closing the laptop at 11:40 p.m. or at midnight.

    Among students receiving the payment incentive, their GPA rose by about 0.08 points that semester – roughly a quarter of the gap between students who arrived with above-average and below-average high school grades.

    Once the payments stopped after four weeks, students who had received the money were still sleeping about eight minutes longer per night for the remaining three to four weeks of the study. The effect was smaller than during our study, but our findings suggest that some of the change in sleep habits persisted for up to a month after the end of the incentive.

    The effects of the intervention on sleep and GPA were largest among first-term freshmen, whose routines are not yet necessarily fixed.

    Rewards work – if they come right away

    Timing mattered too: Delivering the payment as a lump sum at the end of the semester, rather than every morning, produced only about two-thirds of the effect on sleep.

    The effects of the intervention on GPA faded over a couple of academic terms. Grades remained higher in the following semester, but two semesters later we could no longer detect an effect.

    Bedtime reminders and morning feedback on their own – with no money attached – had little effect. Students who received them slept only marginally more. The problem was not motivation: Nearly all said they wanted more sleep than they were getting. The challenge was following through on that intention night after night.

    Investing in sleep

    Our results show that universities should look at how the environment they create fosters or discourages good sleep habits.

    Late evening deadlines to submit assignments and early classes can both make it harder for students to get enough sleep. Changing some of these features costs little compared with many academic support programs, and it may be worth testing alongside other interventions aimed directly at students.

    Reminders and feedback might also work better if they change over time, rather than becoming familiar and easy to tune out.

    Very few universities or students treat sleep as part of an investment in education, or ask whether the schedules and incentives schools create make adequate sleep harder. Our results suggest they should.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

  • Could you survive The Oregon Trail? An emergency medicine doctor offers tips on how to not die in the great outdoors
    You might not die of dysentery on the trail these days, but there is still plenty of danger outdoors. Different_Brian/iStock via Getty Images Plus
    ,

    Could you survive The Oregon Trail? An emergency medicine doctor offers tips on how to not die in the great outdoors

    The old computer game’s hazards still hold lessons for modern hikers, even with smartphones, better medicine and sturdier equipment.

    If you grew up in the United States in the 1980s or ’90s, chances are you remember The Oregon Trail. For many like me, it was our first computer game and our first introduction to wilderness survival. We hunted buffalo, forded rivers, broke wagon wheels and, of course, learned about dysentery years before Google even existed, all while hoping our group would make it to Oregon City alive.

    Lately, the game has found a second life. Nostalgic social media posts, memes and updated versions of the game have introduced The Oregon Trail to a new generation while reminding millennials just how unforgiving that grainy computer screen journey could be.

    As a physician who specializes in emergency and wilderness medicine, I started thinking about how much of what the game taught me about surviving in the wilderness still applies today. After all, modern hikers and campers have access to tools the pioneers could never have imagined.

    Surprisingly, I’d argue that more lessons from The Oregon Trail hold up than you might think.

    Clean water is crucial

    The Oregon Trail game made dysentery famous for an entire generation. Fortunately, advances in sanitation, hand hygiene and antibiotics have made large outbreaks like those that wagon trains and military camps experienced much less common, at least in the United States.

    That doesn’t mean gastrointestinal illnesses have disappeared. Traveler’s diarrhea and cholera are still an important cause of illness around the world. Untreated water, poor hand hygiene and contaminated food can still derail any trip.

    Simple habits such as purifying drinking water, washing hands before meals and after using the bathroom, and practicing good camp hygiene remain some of the easiest ways to stay healthy outdoors.

    Steaming pot of water on small portable stove on top of a plank of wood in a forest
    Boiling is the most reliable way to purify your water. Veronika Lunina/iStock via Getty Images

    Water purification is important with wilderness travel in the United States and in many areas of the world. There are many easy and cost-effective ways to purify water, such as boiling, filtration and treating with chemical disinfectants. Each method has its benefits and downsides.

    Boiling is often the most accessible method. While it can kill bacteria, viruses and parasites, it will not remove water contaminants such as heavy metals, including lead and arsenic, or industrial contamination such as pesticides. Consider boiling your water for at least one to three minutes, depending on your altitude, to purify it. Water filtration is an easy option for backpackers but is less effective at removing viruses.

    If you’re unable to boil your water, another way to ensure water safety is to filter it, then use another method to disinfect it.

    Respect all waterways

    You may no longer have to ford the river with oxen, but rivers, lakes and other bodies of water present unique hazards that outdoor adventure enthusiasts can overlook.

    Moving water can be more dangerous than people realize. Even the best swimmers can drown in rip currents.

    Cross bodies of water only when absolutely necessary. Avoid any water crossings after recent rainfall, as the water level often rises and the current can be faster and stronger. Submerged objects – rocks, fallen trees and other debris – as well as changing weather, flash flooding and strong currents can make crossing more dangerous.

    If possible, use a Coast Guard-approved life jacket when you’re crossing water or on a boat.

    Be ready to go the distance

    It’s not just a broken wagon axle that can send a trip sideways. One thing The Oregon Trail captured well is how distance changes everything. A sprained ankle in a city usually means an inconvenient trip home or to the doctor, but a sprained ankle 5 miles from the trailhead may mean that someone will need to carry you. The same is true for other common wilderness concerns, such as dehydration, heat illness, infections or even blisters.

    Preparation is about packing a first aid kit and thinking ahead. Ask yourself what you would do if your hike took twice as long as expected or if you unexpectedly had to spend the night outside. Research your route and carry more food and water than you think you’ll need. Check the weather and be prepared for it to change, with extra clothing and options for rain.

    Group of hikers walking through forest, away from camera
    It’s dangerous to go alone. FG Trade/E+ via Getty Images

    No one tackled the Oregon Trail alone because it meant you would not survive. There is a lesson here in solo travel and solo mountaineering.

    Traveling alone means that a minor injury such as a sprained ankle could mean crawling to the trailhead to call for help or waiting until you are identified as missing. If you cannot find someone to travel with you, provide an itinerary and travel location to a trusted person. Make sure they know when you should be returning and plan to check in. If you do not return as expected, they can call for help.

    Respect the wildlife

    Large animals still pose a threat across the country. While there may be fewer bison than previously seen on the Oregon Trail, animals in nature deserve respect.

    No selfie is worth being attacked by a brown bear. If you see a dangerous wild animal, avoid approaching and immediately leave the area.

    Venomous snakes are present throughout much of the United States and continue to cause significant injury and death around the world. If someone is bitten, please don’t try to cut the wound or suck out the venom. Instead, keep the person calm, minimize unnecessary movement, and focus on getting them to professional medical care. Antivenom is available in many major hospitals in the United States.

    Even smaller and more docile animals such as deer and squirrels should not be fed. It is dangerous for an animal to get used to receiving food from humans. Additionally, animals carry diseases, such as rabies and leptospirosis, that can be fatal to people.

    Don’t attempt to get close to any animals, no matter how calm or asleep the animal appears to be.

    Technology is a backup, not a plan

    One of the biggest differences between today’s outdoor adventures and those of the Oregon Trail is the ability to communicate.

    Cellphones, GPS apps and emergency beacons have made it possible to call for help from places that were once completely isolated. However, while those devices are incredibly valuable, they shouldn’t encourage you to take bigger risks, as help may be far away, slow to arrive, and injuries in the wilderness can be fatal.

    Travelers can use a smartphone with GPS capacity to avoid getting lost, but downloading any needed maps for offline use can help prevent lack of service from derailing your trip.

    Additionally, an unlocked smartphone that isn’t restricted to one carrier is a great way to store and communicate critical data, such as travel plans and copies of your medical history.

    Person leaning over map spread over a rock beside a bike, plains stretching into the background
    Having an offline map is critical when going somewhere remote. Grant Ordelheide/Aurora Photos/Cavan via Getty Images

    Every environment has its own hazards

    The Oregon Trail travelers worried about river crossings, disease and harsh weather. Today’s hikers face different challenges depending on where they are.

    Desert hikers may struggle with extreme heat and dehydration. Mountain travelers face rapidly changing weather, lightning and high altitude. And coastal explorers can face problems such as riptides, waves, cliffs and unexpected rocky surfaces.

    Altitude illness is often unpredictable and can sneak up on you. Most people experience acute mountain sickness within 24 hours of ascent, developing symptoms such as headache, fatigue, nausea or problems with sleep. Any confusion, difficulty walking, shortness of breath or coughing up significant phlegm should prompt an immediate descent.

    There are commonly used prescription medications to help prevent and treat altitude illness. The mountain will always be waiting for your next attempt.

    Some lessons survive every software update

    Part of what made The Oregon Trail game memorable is that every decision mattered. Success often depended less on luck than on planning ahead, and that lesson still applies.

    When people ask me what one emergency medicine skill everyone should know before heading outdoors, my answer is usually preparation. Thoughtful planning prevents far more emergencies than any single piece of equipment.

    For people who spend a lot of time outdoors, I also recommend taking a wilderness first aid course. These courses teach practical skills to provide medical care in a wilderness environment.

    Nature is no less powerful or unforgiving than it was on the Oregon Trail, and treating it with respect is essential. Combining advances in modern medicine with thoughtful preparation helps stack the odds in your favor so that, just as every Oregon Trail player hoped, everyone in the party makes it to the end.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.
  • Your cells keep a record of every workout you’ve ever done – and those gains persist even after a break from exercise
    Photo credit: Williams+Hirakawa/The Image Bank via Getty Images – Your body retains the benefits of exercise even when you need to hit pause.
    ,

    Your cells keep a record of every workout you’ve ever done – and those gains persist even after a break from exercise

    New research suggests muscle and liver cells retain a memory of exercise, offering hope when injury or life interrupts a workout routine.

    Have you ever taken months off training – maybe due to an injury, a new baby or crushing work deadlines – and come back convinced you were starting from zero?

    Research from our team has some good news: At the cellular level, you probably weren’t.

    We found that muscle and liver cells store memories from every training session in ways that may help improve endurance, control blood sugar levels and even slow weight regain after inactivity.

    Use it or lose it? Maybe not

    For most of the past century, long before fad diets and fancy workout trends took off, exercise was considered one of the most effective lifestyle changes to lower the risk of heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, several cancers and early death for people of all ages. But people typically understood exercise as something whose beneficial effects fade away over time: You use it or lose it.

    When you stop training, your maximum oxygen uptake, muscle gains and insulin sensitivity drift back to where they started, often within weeks. Physical activity guidelines are built on this fact, which is why they emphasize consistency above all else.

    Consistency, however, is a luxury that roughly 3 in 4 American adults aren’t able to enjoy. People can experience injuries, illness, pregnancy or jobs that limit their time for or ability to exercise. If adaptation really resets, every time you step into the gym would be as if you’ve never been there before. But that scenario doesn’t match what coaches and returning athletes typically describe: In practice, people who have trained before can get fit again faster than those who haven’t undergone similar training.

    In recent years, however, scientists have started challenging the concept of “use it or lose it.” New research hints that your cells might keep a record of your training history so all of your gains are not completely lost.

    More than muscle

    We are exercise physiologists who study how cells remember exercise. Our lab and others have shown that the body is able to store a form of exercise memory across different organs.

    To study how this exercise memory works, our team of researchers use an ON-OFF-ON exercise training protocol in mice, which involves an initial four- to eight-week training period, followed by detraining – a period of no exercise – and a second training bout. This method allows us to examine how cells form a memory of exercise, maintain a record of exercise through detraining, and recall memories of prior training when exposed again to exercise.

    Using this strategy, our team found that skeletal muscle memory accelerates muscle growth. Compared to mice with no training history, mice who retrained grew bigger muscles, and the individual muscle fibers inside those muscles grew too. Larger muscle fibers meant that the working cells were themselves getting bigger, rather than the surrounding tissue.

    Looking more closely at these muscle cells, we found that retrained muscle is better at matching energy production to demand – meaning, the muscles were better at drawing from energy stores when it’s needed most – and this ability persists without further exercise. This memory held even when the mice ate a high-fat diet, suggesting that prior training can still offer benefits even when diet is working against those gains.

    Muscle isn’t the only body part that learns from exercise. Working muscle needs fuel, and the liver supplies it during and after training sessions.

    My colleagues and I found that liver cells also store exercise memory and uses it to feed muscle more efficiently. In both mice and people who trained, stopped, then trained again, their livers released higher levels of a family of enzymes called carboxylesterases. These enzymes chop up lipids circulating in the blood, delivering fat in a form that muscle can take up and burn as it grows.

    A record that outlives you

    Recorded cellular memories of exercise may even be passed down to future generations.

    In mice, we found that three to four weeks of maternal and paternal endurance exercise can have a lasting effect on their offspring. Compared to offspring born to sedentary parents, parental exercise granted protection against poor blood sugar levels and excess weight gain for an entire year after birth.

    Researchers have hypothesized numerous ways that prenatal exercise may affect offspring. For example, maternal exercise might allow offspring to spend more time developing in the womb or lead parents to producer higher quality milk.

    But there remains much to be discovered on how parents influence the health of their children and whether their lifestyle could provide a fitness advantage across generations.

    Every cell remembers

    Biology has traditionally granted memory to a short list of cells. Neurons store memory in the connections between them. Immune cells store memory so they can recognize pathogens faster and more strongly the next time they encounter them.

    Researchers previously considered all other cells to be memoryless; a cell responds to a signal, then returns to baseline without keeping a record of that interaction. But that assumption is now coming apart.

    Skin stem cells can keep a record of inflammation, allowing them to heal a new wound faster months later. Human fat cells keep a record of obesity that persists even after substantial weight loss, which may account for why you gain weight faster when switching back to a high-calorie diet – the so-called yo-yo effect.

    We propose that every cell in the body remembers exercise, regardless of how little or how much someone trains. The question is how long these records are stored and whether researchers could prolong or expand each cell’s storage capacity. Better understanding of how cells learn and remember exercise, where they store memories and how those memories are preserved could help improve exercise guidelines for those who cannot exercise for prolonged or consistent periods of time.

    To be clear, none of these findings are evidence for skipping the gym; nothing in our data suggests the effects of past training can substitute for present training. But there is hope that the work you put into getting in shape isn’t completely lost over time.

    Somewhere, deep in your cells, there is a record waiting to be replayed the next time you lace up your running shoes, pick up a pair of dumbbells or want to fulfill a New Year’s resolution.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

Explore More Health Stories

Health

Could you survive The Oregon Trail? An emergency medicine doctor offers tips on how to not die in the great outdoors

Health

Your cells keep a record of every workout you’ve ever done – and those gains persist even after a break from exercise

Health

Friendship is built over time, through ordinary moments – I teach lonely college students to notice them

Health

Pope Leo XIV’s lung cancer highlights growing number of nonsmokers diagnosed with the disease – and younger people too