GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 6
  • 2

How a Neighborhood’s Walkability Can Increase Property Values

  • Posted by: Carol Coletta
  • on August 27, 2009 at 3:42 pm

People who love cities have known for years what the rest of the country is just starting to figure out: urban life is a beautiful thing. But even city lovers may be surprised at the premium home buyers place on urban living.

A new study from CEOs for Cities to be released this week shows that homes in close proximity to multiple destinations, such as stores, libraries, parks, coffee shops, restaurants, are more valuable than similar homes in neighborhoods where there is less to walk to, pointing to a bright spot in the residential real estate market.

The report, “Walking the Walk: How Walkability Raises Housing Values in U.S. Cities” by Portland, Oregon economist Joseph Cortright, analyzed data from 94,000 real estate transactions in 15 major markets and found that in 13 of the 15 markets, higher levels of walkability, as measured by Walk Score, were directly linked to higher home values. (If you are not familiar with Walk Score, it calculates the closest amenities to an address, then assigns a “Walk Score” from 0–100, with 100 being the most walkable and 0 being totally car-dependent. Walk Scores of 70 or more indicate neighborhoods where it’s possible to live without a car.)

“Even in a turbulent economy, we know that walkability adds value to residential property just as additional square footage, bedrooms, bathrooms and other amenities do,” said Cortright. “It’s clear that consumers assign a tangible value to the convenience factor of living in more walkable places with access to a variety of destinations.”

Here’s an example of the effect of walkability on housing values from Charlotte, North Carolina: The Ashley Park neighborhood has a typical Walk Score of 54, and the median home price is $280,000. In the Wilmore neighborhood— above average Walk Score  71—an otherwise similar home would be valued at $314,000. Controlling for all other factors including size, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, age, neighborhood income levels, distance from the central business district and access to jobs, if you were to pick up that house in Ashley Park, and place it in more walkable Wilmore, it would increase in value by $34,000 or 12 percent, Cortright said.

In the typical metropolitan areas studied, the premium for neighborhoods with above average Walk Scores compared to those with average Walk Scores ranged from $4,000 to $34,000, depending on the metro area. That’s big money for both homeowners and cash-strapped local governments trying to figure out how to stave off falling property values (and falling tax revenues).

A number of trends are reshaping the American Dream, and the value home buyers now place in urban neighborhoods is clearly one of the most important.  Now, planning, zoning and development decisions have to catch up to consumers.

You can listen to an interview with report author Joe Cortright on Smart City here.

Carol Coletta is the President and CEO of CEOs for Cities, and the host of the nationally-syndicated public radio show, Smart City.

  • Filed under: Blog : Urban Renaissance
  • Tags: Charlotte , Cities
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 2 Comments
    • Posted by: Andrew Price
    • on August 27, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    I’d wager that homebuyers still actually undervalue walkability. I bet you could do some survey that exposed how long commutes and lots of car time hurt quality of life more than people anticipate they will, or imagine they do.

    Also, I’m curious if WalkScore itself has raised the profile of walkability.

    • Posted by: DustinRagland
    • on October 14, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    in my home city, OKC, the added value of walkability has certainly not come full swing, but there are also few places where one can have walkable lives, and in the places that do support it (mostly downtown)-there is either only very expensive housing, or none at all. 

Login or Sign up to discuss this article

Related Content

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Walkability Calculator

    Walk Score, a new Google Maps mash-up, will calculate how walkable your neighborhood is on a 100-point scale.The score is ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Magazine : The Transportation Issue

    Walk On

    A look at America’s most pedestrian friendly cities Walking is arguably the most efficient mode of transportation, and you ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Walk Easy

    Walk Score, a website that calculates the walkability of American neighborhoods based on the density of stores, schools and other ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Magazine : Look

    LOOK: Lanefab Microhousing

    Neighborhoods in Vancouver tend to facilitate walking, biking, and public transit with greater ease than the the vast ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Magazine : The GOOD 100

    The GOOD 100: Bulldozing Cities

    Small Is Beautiful: The case for shrinking cities The quality of a city is determined by what life is ...
    Read & Discuss

Recent Readers

  • Eric Small
  • Amrit
  • zachfrechette
  • Will Etling
See all

This Week In Blogs

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. How Thanksgiving Got Its Turkey
  2. Is Newsweek’s Sarah Palin Cover Sexist?
  3. The Culture of the Interrobang
  4. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  5. Sad or Cute: Hermit Crab Makes Home in Broken Bottle
  6. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  7. Are You Raising a Furkid?
  8. Rental Goats Clear Brush Better, Beat Cosmonauts in Space Race
  9. The Charter for Compassion
  10. Charging Forward with Mission Motor’s Electric Superbike
  1. The Charter for Compassion
  2. New School: How the Web Liberalized Liberal Arts Education
  3. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  4. EyeWriter: Paralyzed Artist Draws with His Eyes
  5. The Culture of the Interrobang
  6. Intermission: Eye-popping 3D Building Projections
  7. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  8. The Kids Are All Right
  9. Charging Forward with Mission Motor’s Electric Superbike
  10. Singularity 101: What Is the Singularity?

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata