Writing in The Economist‘s “World in 2010” issue, pop star Shakira pleads with the world’s leaders to establish a “Global Fund for Education” in order to help attain the Millennium Development Goal of getting every child a primary school education by 2015. The fund, she explains, will be similar to one previously created to help eradicate AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria worldwide in uniting the developing world and “civil society” to work together against a common ill.“A lot is at stake. In the past two years over 600 schools in Afghanistan have been bombed, burned or shut down by extremists. Eighty percent of these have been schools for girls. Why? Because the education of a child is the most powerful form of national security-and that’s why it is such a threat to militants everywhere.”Shakira has long been involved in fighting for increased access to education through her Barefoot Foundation. The organization has developed a system not unlike Geoffrey Canada’s Children’s Zone in Harlem that provides not only instruction but also health services and support to the three Colombian communities it serves. According to her Economist piece, the cost of freeing children from a continuous cycle of poverty is fewer than $2 per child per day.The Barefoot Foundation is now expanding its approach to other parts of the world.Photo from Flickr user kindofadraag
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

