There’s a bill in the House that would let kids with drug possession convictions get federal financial aid for college again (they haven’t been able to since 1998). McClatchy has the story:The bill, which a House of Representatives committee approved recently and which the full House probably will consider after its August recess, says that those convicted of selling illegal drugs still would be barred from receiving federal financial aid. However, students convicted of possession would be able to get loans, grants and work-study assistance. This is great news. Even if you think there’s something wrong with giving college loans to kids who’ve smoked pot (or, to be exact, kids who’ve been convicted of possessing it), this law is totally unfair in practice. Minorities and kids from rough neighborhoods end up getting hassled by the police way more frequently, so they’re just statistically more likely to get in trouble for having a little reefer than a middle-class white kid, even if they don’t actually smoke pot as much.The provision is part of this new Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, which looks like a great little bundle of college loan-related laws. It increases aid in a number of different ways and still ends up saving $87 billion over ten years by administering loans through the government rather than through the banks.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

