Remember MySpace? The former social network of the moment just announced it was laying off two-thirds of its international staff (they also recently announced that they would be cutting about 30 percent of their U.S. staff).This isn’t a knock against MySpace. It’s apparently quite hard competing with Facebook right now. Rather, let it serve as a cautionary note that every thing on the internet seems important and game changing until the day it isn’t. Rupert Murdoch, a not-unsavvy businessman, dropped some $500 million on MySpace only to see its market share dissapear basically overnight (thank God for music, eh, MySpace?). He was, you have to imagine, fairly blindsided.That’s because no one knows what the next Friendster, or MySpace, or even Google is going to be until it’s here and you’re suddenly a loser for not using it. But that day will always come, and everyone will be scrambling to scrap their old worldview that whatever the old thing was the most important thing in the world. And when it does, you sort of kick yourself for not realizing that everything-especially the cutting edge of businesses, especially especially the cutting edge of internet businesses-is protean, and will always be replaced by something different and better (and the most important thing ever to happen to the world) before you even know it.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

