Over the weekend, Times architecture critic Nicolai Ousoussoff published an article talking about the need for cities to drastically reinvent themselves and for urban planners and civic leaders to start thinking about city planning in a different way. Cities, being incredibly important creative and economic centers, he argues, deserve a better functioning design. He cites as an example a plan to dig up the Los Angeles river and replace it with a park, as well as more nebulous projects in the Bronx and in Buffalo, New York (we’ll be talking more about Buffalo later in the week, stay tuned). The most interesting is Ousoussoff’s endorsement of a “National Infrastructure Bank” (you can read a proposal for it here; a bill was introduced into the Senate to form such a bank in 2007, but it seems to not have gone anywhere), a World Bank-esque entity that would fund public projects like this, as cities are often unable to pay for the most ambitious and forward-looking ideas that they need. Check out the whole article here.Photo by J. Emilio Flores for The New York Times
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

