Hard to believe but totally true: In the workplace, a Woman Dollar = 78 cents, and a Man Dollar = 100 cents. The good news is that big things have been going on to try to correct that imbalance. Or, rather, to help underpaid women take their employers to court to correct that imbalance.Today, Senate is expected to pass the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act, both of which Obama is also expected to support-a signal that the new administration intends to swifty right some of the wrongs inflicted under Bush.Setting things right in the eyes of the law is a crucial next step for fair pay-no doubt about it. But we still have a ways to go. Even with these laws passed, to get those extra 22 cents on the buck, a woman must still somehow ferret out confidential information about who makes more than her at work. She then must collect that information and file a discrimination complaint. Eventually, she may even have to take the matter to court. So while it’s a step in the right direction, it’s no silver bullet.Maybe the Brits have the right idea on this one. Facing similarly embarrassing pay-gap statistics, they’re now considering one of the oldest tricks in the book: public shaming.Image via www.iwpr.org/pdf/R334_BWStateEconomies2006.pdf
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

