A popular story in The New York Times this week documents the rising trend of “passive houses“-homes that are built without furnaces and instead are constructed to retain heat generated by the sun, appliances, and the occupants themselves. They’re slightly more costly to build, but the savings-both financial and environmental-are pretty staggering.It’s an exciting trend, to be sure, but not everyone is in the market to build a new house. So what can you do to your existing abode? One answer is to add solar panels. Historically, this has been an intimidating prospect, mainly because of the high cost associated with installation. But a new site, RoofRay, let’s you estimate how much power you could potentially generate from the sun, and how much it could save you each year. You input your address, then use RoofRay’s tools to map out the shape of your roof. In addition to estimating annual savings, the site lets you compare various different installation options and chart your return on investment. At worst it’s a fun awareness tool-I, for example, feel great about my 8.97 watts-per-square-foot potential-but at its best, it’s a way to understand the options available to you when purchasing a new house, or renovating your current one.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

