Congratulations to former Finnish president Martti Ahtisaari, the latest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. According to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which administers the Peace Prize-the Swedes give out the other prizes-Ahtisarri beat out 196 other nominees for his “important efforts, on several continents and over more than three decades, to resolve international conflicts.” Those efforts include: freeing Namibia from the grips of South Africa. (The country gained its sovereignty in 1990.)Up until Ahtisaari’s official elevation to Nobel laureate, rampant speculation surrounded jailed Chinese activist Hu Jia as the favorite to win the prize. The Chinese activist-a vocal critic of the Communist government on issues related to policy, the environment, and AIDS- was rounded up in December 2007 for his dissent. The London-based Telegraph newspaper accused the Committee for playing it safe with its selection of Ahtisaari: “In a year that has seen international attention focused on China because of the Olympic Games, the Nobel Committee could have used its role as the world’s conscience to remind everyone of Beijing’s miserable human rights record.”Another person passed over by the Committee, the Telegraph piece points out, was Russian human rights lawyer Lidia Yusupova, who is known as “the bravest woman in Europe.”Do you think the Committee took the easy way out?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

