The New York Times reports that “a seven-page questionnaire being sent by the office of President-elect Barack Obama to those seeking cabinet and other high-ranking posts may be the most extensive – some say invasive – application ever.”The questionnaire asks applicants to provide links to any online profiles they’ve had (like Facebook or MySpace pages), describe any potentially embarrassing emails they’ve sent, and even open their diaries to Obama (see above). NPR has a pdf of the full questionnaire here.There’s a debate brewing in the media about whether the questionnaire is too invasive or will disqualify valuable candidates. We’re not worried. As Levi Johnson and Whole Foods CEO John Makey will tell you, MySpace pages and online comments aren’t private to begin with when you have a national profile.Will the questionnaire disqualify able candidates? Unlikely. Many of the questions ask about associations that could be used “even unfairly” against an Obama administration. By that standard Obama would have plenty to list himself (Wright, Rezko, Ayers, et al).They’re not trying to screen out everyone with a vulnerability; they’re trying to assess and preempt potential problems.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

