As water becomes a more central part to our conversations-especially issues of water scarcity and the possible/probable impending wars over it-I’ve been thinking a lot about the holes in our own water policy. As it stands, many contend (and I agree) that our standards for tap water are lacking, which is going to become a much bigger deal now that we’ve all decided that bottled water is as taboo an accessory as a cigarette. Meanwhile, out Clean Water Act of 1972, which is considered one of the best and most trailblazing water laws in the world, has been chipped away at for some time.Luckily, Obama’s new EPA head Lisa Jackson has vowed to move rather swiftly to right some of the environmental wrongs committed by previous administrations (especially that last one), particularly in regards to water policy. That’s why, when three senators presented to Congress the Clean Water Restoration Act a few weeks back, it was very encouraging news. I was also happy to see this Op Ed in today’s Times.Here’s hoping the act passes. Safer drinking water, safeguarding the 20 million acres of wetlands that are currently unprotected, and cracking down on revolting and environmentally devastating runoff from coal mining and industrial animal feedlots sounds like a great start to me.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

