You’ve probably heard about how Canada, fed up with its Conservative government, is using archaic but useful laws to get its prime minister out of office. Sounds like a more civil version of impeachment, right? Maybe, but it’s getting ugly up there.First, Canada’s three opposition parties formed a coalition against PM Stephen Harper, who they say is driving the country’s economy into the ground. Then Harper slammed back calling the opposition “socialist” and “separatist,” and is now suspending the power they were using to get him out of office in the first place.Meanwhile, people are losing their jobs left and right, the worst it’s been since the early ’80s (which sucked).Anyway, since most things Canadian are a little confusing (eh, loonies, Degrassi’s success et al.), even to those of us from there, CBC reporter Neil Macdonald offers this rather clear explanation.(Photo via CBC)
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

