Just before yesterday’s St. Louis Rams/Oakland Raiders football game in St. Louis, a group of five St. Louis Rams players led the team onto the field with their hands in the air, a reference to the past week’s Ferguson protests. The “hands up, don’t shoot” gesture was soon condemned as “offensive” by the St. Louis Police Officers Association. In the words of SLPOA Business Manager Jeff Roorda:


“I know that there are those that will say that these players are simply exercising their First Amendment rights. Well I’ve got news for people who think that way, cops have first amendment rights too, and we plan to exercise ours. I’d remind the NFL and their players that it is not the violent thugs burning down buildings that buy their advertiser’s products. It’s cops and the good people of St. Louis and other NFL towns that do. Somebody needs to throw a flag on this play. If it’s not the NFL and the Rams, then it’ll be cops and their supporters.”

In the St. Louis area, response was predictably polarized. Many pointed out the irony of Roorda calling out a group young black men for showing their support of a community grappling with the death of a young black man, while others seemed to channel his sentiments using the #RamsFanNoMore hashtag.

The national media similarly scrambled to make sense of the gesture— some celebrating it in the context of black athletes like Tommie Smith and John Carlos who made the black power salute on the Olympic podium in 1968 in Mexico City. Others seemed to suggest that something criminal lurked beneath the Rams’ bold gesture. NJ.com, for instance, pointed to the “several run-ins with the police” that apparent ringleader Kenny Britt had in the past.

Amidst all of the debate, however, no one has really examined Roorda’s conspicuous claim that the Rams pre-game statement was essentially about First Amendment rights. As the logic goes, the Rams players believed that an injustice was perpetrated against Michael Brown that was compounded by Darren Wilson’s exoneration, and that the gesture was simply the players expressing that opinion. Not that any of us have any reason to all of a sudden have faith in “evidence,” but the facts seem to point towards the gesture being made in support of a community rather than defiance of one.

When asked after the game if the team was taking sides, Britt told reporters, “No, not at all. We just wanted to let the community know that we support them.” Rams tight end Jared Cook struck a similar conciliatory note: “Whatever happened from both sides, there has to be some kind of change.” The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported that in the week leading up to yesterday’s game, several of the Rams players were vowing to “win one for Ferguson.” Said linebacker James Laurinaitis: “I think that the store owners that were looted, you feel for them and what they’re going through. You feel for the kids that had school canceled. You just want things to get back to normal as soon as possible.”

These hardly sound like the voices of defiance. They are neither Muhammad Ali taking a stand against the Vietnam War or a group of thugs taking a stand in defense of lawlessness. They are the voices of civic engagement.

What happened yesterday just prior to the game at the Edward Jones Dome had less to do with free speech than about an emerging form of social engagement that professional athletes are having with the world. These athletes don’t view sports as mere merriments, abstractions from the messiness of civil society—but as intimately connected with the social world.

It is perhaps no coincidence that this public gesture occurred on the very same field that, just months earlier, the first openly gay NFL player first strode. In drafting Michael Sam, Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher refused to accept the notion that the messy realities of contemporary social life should be treated as “distractions” in the mythical oasis of the “level playing field.”

When Kenny Britt, Jared Cook, Stedman Bailey, Chris Givens, and Tayvon Austin (who’s first name NFL announcers consistently mangle as “Trayvon”) took the field yesterday with their arms held aloft, they were showing that they had internalized a valuable lesson from their coach—that sports are not fantastical spaces for escape, but part of our social universe, the same as a neighborhood liquor store.

Today, the St. Louis Rams stand as a stark counterpoint to Washington Redskins supporters bemoaning the “special interest groups,” encroaching upon their hallowed history pressuring the team to update its mascot in the name of “political sensitivity” and to a generation of athletes proclaiming “I am not a role model” as if it were sacred writ. In their conscientious signal to the community, the Rams showed once again that the fight for justice is hardly a distraction.

By the way, the Rams beat the Raiders yesterday, 52-0.

[youtube ratio=”0.5625″ position=”standard” caption=””]

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman