As a U.S. taxpayer, you now own a small share in many of our august and venerable financial institutions, because they were run so poorly that only the government was willing to buy stock in them to keep them afloat.Luckily for you and your investment, most of the people who ran the companies that poorly are still running them. So, you should be unsurprised, but quite chagrined to learn that Citi and Morgan Stanley are going to take $3 billion (that’s right, billion) dollars to give their brokers “retention awards”-the new, politically correct term for “bonuses”-in order to keep said brokers from fleeing the sinking ships that are these companies.Just to remind you, some of that is your money. Are you happy with what is being done with it?Meanwhile, in England, conservative (that’s right, conservative) leader David Cameron has just proposed a cap on bonuses for all bankers who work for banks that the government has taken large stakes in. It must be something to the order of $500,000, like the CEO salary cap proposed by some U.S. Senators, right? No. It’s $2,835 (£2,000). I imagine a lot of brokers are going to be asking to transfer to the American offices in the next few days.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

