GOOD.is
GOOD is a collaboration of individuals, businesses, and nonprofits pushing the world forward. Get involved.
  • Home
  • |
  • Columns ▶
    • BoingBoing on GOOD
    • Joe Ippolito on Business
    • Carol Coletta on Cities
    • Alissa Walker on Design
    • Ben Jervey on the Environment
    • Peter Smith on Food
    • Truman National Security Project on Foreign Policy
    • Picture Show
    • Mark Peters on Language
    • Anne Trubek on Literature
    • See All Columns
  • |
  • Video
  • |
  • Infographics
  • |
  • Community
  • |
  • Events
  • Follow GOOD:
  • twitter
  • flickr
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss feed
  • Business
  • |
  • Cities
  • |
  • Culture
  • |
  • Design
  • |
  • Education
  • |
  • Environment
  • |
  • Food
  • |
  • Health
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • People
  • |
  • Politics
  • |
  • Technology
  • |
  • Transportation
  • 13
  • 10

Country-by-country Abortion Laws

  • Posted by: GOOD
  • on December 3, 2007 at 6:20 pm

The abortion debate certainly hasn’t cooled in the U.S., and with so much attention paid to Row vs. Wade Roe v. Wade, who thinks about the abortion laws in Trinidad & Tobago?

We do. Here’s our Country-by-country Abortion Laws transparency.

  • Filed under: Magazine : Transparency
  • Share
  • Discuss
  • Mark it good!
  • Facebook
  •   Twitter
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
Direct link to this post:
Send as an Email:
Your email address:
Recipient's email address:
Message:

X
DISCUSSION: 10 Comments
    • Posted by: ciao_alexisb
    • on December 7, 2007 at 5:01 am

    I really like this transparency, it shows very clearly the difference between South and North.

    • Posted by: acidspit
    • on December 7, 2007 at 3:13 pm

    that abortion was banned in Mexico.

    • Posted by: akpons
    • on December 10, 2007 at 12:31 pm

    It’s not banned in Mexico, they just passed legal abortion in Mexico city this year. In most of LATAM, abortions are a crime, but the abortion rate is far higher than in Western Europe or the US. Colombia – where abortion is illegal even if a woman’s life is in danger – averages more than one abortion per woman over all of her fertile years. I don’t think the map accurately represents abortion in all the regions.

    • Posted by: gt5298b
    • on January 9, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    This is really interesting….the developed western world and the former (or currently) communist world permit abortions in any case. I suppose once a country becomes affluent and/or human beings lose their dignity (as in communism), it is okay to kill a baby. Or is it the other away around? Killing our babies allows us to be more affluent?

    • Posted by: lizzard99
    • on January 11, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    You know what is interesting? All the drama surrounding abortion. I find it interesting that you look at the developed world and the communist world through such narrow eyes. All you see is affluence? How about educated? Yes, the developed world is educated, as well as affluent. While there is a lot to dislike in Communist governments, all human beings who live in a communist country have not lost their dignity. What a ridiculous, blanket statement to make. No one is ‘killing babies’, either. They are terminating pregnancies. These are fetuses, not babies. Let’s clarify this. Let’s look at the facts, and try to take the drama out of it. There are over 6.6 billion people on this planet. These 6 billion are warring, killing each other as adults and children, polluting the planet, performing heinous crimes against each other, other living things, the planet, etc. We need less humans, not more. If someone does not want to bring a pregnancy to term, they have the right to end it. There are enough abused, unwanted LIVING children. Let’s try to save those. Do all you people who are against abortion want to adopt and save every abused and unwanted child? I don’t think so. So, while I respect your personal distaste for abortion, leave the rest of us alone and get out of our uterus. What I do or don’t do with my body is my personal business, not yours; as yours isn’t mine. Let’s redirect that energy to the living and help the young, the old, the abused, the tortured, the defenseless. There is enough of that to go around, unfortunately.

    • Posted by: mamapaloma
    • on January 16, 2008 at 1:27 am

    …or countries that protect women’s rights, including reproductive choice, tend to be more affluent…

    …and the phrase “abortion permitted with no restrictions” is very misleading. Most countries, including many states in the US, place significant restrictions on when and how an abortion can be performed. Additionally, unofficial but very real restrictions to access (87% of US counties have no abortion provider, most US women and girls do not have sufficient finances to access abortion within allowed time periods) put this choice well out of the reach of many women and girls.

    • Posted by: culturejamforlife
    • on January 16, 2008 at 10:36 am

    “Abortion” is the euphemism used for the killing of an innocent and vulnerable human being. And it’s prima facie wrong to kill innocent human beings. All early feminists, from suffragists Susan B. Anthony to Elizabeth Cady Stanton, to the founder of modern feminism Mary Wollenscraft, to the writer of the Equal Rights Amendment Mary Alice Paul, were ALL pro-life. Only until the 60’s did the population control advocates hoodwink the more gullible/evil feminists into supporting “abortion.” Abortion is just another way to dehumanize women and children. NOW and other pro-abortion organizations even support “live birth” abortion, where a child is born and then left to die. They opposed the bill to stop this. Sick and evil. See Feminists for Life and Culture Jam for Life.

    • Posted by: amber212
    • on January 24, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    I have just been introduced to the magazine, and I love it. But your transparency of abortion laws is quite misleading. Roe v. Wade is in danger of being overturned in the U.S., and the cost of the procedure itself is extremely prohibitive. There are quite a few restrictions on abortion in this country, but your map makes it seem like it’s available to any and every woman. It’s not. It’s irresponsible to say that there are no restrictions in the U.S.

    • Posted by: amber212
    • on January 24, 2008 at 12:23 pm

    I only read this issue of Good last night, and was so shocked by the deceptive nature of this “transparency.” It’s quite the opposite of transparent, actually. I’m glad someone felt the same way I did.

    • Posted by: allanb
    • on September 6, 2009 at 6:22 am

    Again, ‘Transparency’ makes another error with Israel; in Israel abortion is allowed if the woman is under 17 or over 40, the pregnancy was conceived under illegal circumstances (rape, incest or outside wedlock), if the child is mentally handicap, or for socioeconomic reasons. Israel is very liberal when it comes to a woman’s right to choose, more than anyone can say about its neighbors.

Login or Sign up to discuss this article

About The Contributors

  • GOOD

    GOOD

    Hi, we're GOOD. We hope you are too.

     

Recent Readers

  • dejesusjessica
  • rob273b
  • morganclendaniel
See all

Related Content

  • Magazine : Transparency

    Transparency: Which Countries Eat the Most Meat

    An increase in the consumption of meat is directly correlated to an increase in a country’s economic ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Preemptive Pro-Life

    Louisiana: a state that has passed a law that is just waiting for Roe v. Wade to get overturned. Do ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Supreme Ban

    Bush's new appointees to the Supreme Court flexed their muscles for the first time today, upholding a ban ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Disturbing "Art" Weekly Roundup

    We're a little behind with these, but we think they're more impressively disgusting when aggregated: *A ...
    Read & Discuss

  • Blog : GOOD Blog

    Abortion Rights: Obama's First Act as President?

    Probably not! But  there’s a flurry of frantic op-eds popping up (like this one, by Chuck Norris) that Obama may ...
    Read & Discuss

This Week In Magazine

  • Most Discussed
  • Most GOODMarked
  1. Transparency: The Effects of Bike Commuting on Obesity
  2. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  3. The GOOD Guide to COP15: An Introduction
  4. The Kids Are All Right
  5. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  6. Picture Show: Breach
  7. LOOK: On the Road with Ethos Alliance
  8. Transparency: How Education Spending Affects Graduation Rates
  9. Action, In Words and Pictures
  10. Transparency: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch
  1. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Fire this Time: Copenhagen and the War for the Future
  2. Picture Show: Breach
  3. The Kids Are All Right
  4. The GOOD Guide to COP15: An Introduction
  5. The GOOD 100: Cowpooling
  6. Picture Show: Four Days in Dubai
  7. Transparency: The Change in Carbon Emissions
  8. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Treaty
  9. Action, In Words and Pictures
  10. The GOOD Guide to COP15: The Players

GOOD Magazine
About
|
Join
|
Sign In

Categories

  • Business
  • Cities
  • Culture
  • Design
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Media
  • People
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Transportation

Special Features

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Infographics
  • Look
  • Picture Show
  • Q&A
  • Video

Community

  • Community Board
  • Member directory
  • Join the Community

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Flickr

Magazine

  • Current issue
  • Back issues
  • Subscribe
  • Gift a gift
  • Renew/Service

GOOD

  • What is GOOD?
  • Make GOOD better
© GOOD Worldwide LLC. - all rights reserved
  • Company details
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • RSS
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Powered by Verkata