I’m en route to the promised land-otherwise known as Sausalito, California-to attend a three-day conference on envisioning the future of higher education. This year’s DGREE summit, sponsored by Lens Ventures and the Lumina Foundation, will bring together forces that don’t normally converge when the topic is education-venture capitalists and silicon valley entrepreneurs, small and big business, academics and thinkers from the foundation world. Oh, and journalists, too. Among the required viewing is Bennington College President Elizabeth Coleman’s proclamation to reinvent liberal arts education from last year’s TED Conference, Tara Lemmey’s essay from the Huffington Post on how higher education might be retooled from the ground up, and “With Their Whole Lives Ahead of Them,” the first of a three-part study that surveyed more than 600 individuals, ages 22 to 30. It compares those who started a college degree but did not finish it with those who did. The findings of which are startling. So here’s to interesting dialogue and talk of innovation. Also, one entirely selfish motivation-getting out of the 30-degree icebox that is New York City. As it concerns higher education, what are the policies, infrastructure and innovations needed to reinvent it? Dispatches to follow.Photo via
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

