The principle behind Chekhov’s Gun goes something like this: If there’s a rifle in the first act, it better be fired by the third. The great Russian writer, of course, was talking about eliminating unnecessary elements of story plots, but it seems that we Americans have been taking his words all too literally-and to the grave. According to a University of Pennsylvania research team led by Charles Branas (not to be confused with Charles Bronson, pictured), people who carry guns are far more likely to get shot and killed than people who are unarmed. From New Scientist:Overall, Branas’s study found that people who carried guns were 4.5 times as likely to be shot and 4.2 times as likely to get killed compared with unarmed citizens. When the team looked at shootings in which victims had a chance to defend themselves, their odds of getting shot were even higher.So is carrying a gun an automatic death wish? Not exactly. Branas did point out that the study should not necessarily be taken as fodder for gun control advocacy, nor should it strike fear in the hearts of Second Amendment supporters. To paraphrase him, the study should function simply as the beginning of a conversation.Photo (cc) by Flickr user Hryck.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

