President Obama took the advice of Bret and Jemaine from Flight of the Conchords and asked Peter Orszag, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to “do a budget” for the fiscal year of 2010.Orszag (seen here estimating how many Americans are still gainfully employed) writes about his approach to the task in his first ever post on the new OMB blog. OMG! He says his big goals were 1) do away with accounting gimmicks that have made past budgets look better than they were, 2) halve the deficit in Obama’s first term, 3) set aside cash for reforming health care, and 4) invest in education and energy.The Washington Post talks about how unhappy Republicans are with the budget in a piece titled “Republicans Attack Obama Budget, Call It Loaded With Spending”. Indeed, being a budget, it contains lists of expenses. They’re mostly mad that Obama plans to let tax cuts for the rich expire and start fining companies for carbon emissions that exceed a certain level.Robert Reich loves it because, “it represents the biggest redistribution of income from the wealthy to the middle class and poor this nation has seen in more than forty years.” I guess you can say that kind of thing out loud these days.You can see the full budget for yourself here.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

