That’s my favorite entry in the second annual Freakonomics* six-word new American motto contest. It captures our hubris, as well as a tongue-in-cheek reference to a crucial moment of the current financial crisis, while also being chillingly true-for better or for worse. The winning entry of last year’s contest-“Our Worst Critics Prefer to Stay”-speaks to a different time, a different set of problems, and a different attitude. Here’s the full list of this year’s finalists (and the original call for entries):1. Consumption’s the Cure That Ails Us.2. We Will Get It Right, Eventually.3. We Are Too Big to Fail.4. The Streets Are Paved With CASH4GOLD.COM.5. Learn to Live Within Your Means.6. Wow, Can You Believe This Place?The Freakonomics boys are requesting you cast your vote in the comments section of their post, and apologize for their lack of a fancy voting widget.*Sidenote: kudos to those dudes for keeping that blog going, and making it routinely excellent.Photo by Flickr user kevindooley.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

