For my money, refrigeration ranks pretty highly in the list of modern conveniences-right up there with the internet, indoor plumbing, and the automobile.Of course, as we continue to learn, most of the conveniences of our modernity have come, to some extent, at the expense of the environment. That’s why a small but growing number of people are opting to quit the fridge. Cold turkey. Or, I suppose, room temperature turkey. From NYTimes:As drastic as the move might seem, a small segment of the green movement has come to regard the refrigerator as an unacceptable drain on energy, and is choosing to live without it. In spite of its ubiquity-99.5 percent of American homes have one-these advocates say the refrigerator is unnecessary, as long as one is careful about shopping choices and food storage.It’s bold, going fridge-less, but is it worth it? I’d certainly miss the convenience of that readily available post-work beer. And the article points out that the environmental and financial savings are not as significant as one might think (plus, less food-storage means more shopping which means more gas and/or food packaging). But the idea of “going without” seems increasingly attractive to me. What do you think, could go without your fridge?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

