The Oxford University Press has been quietly making some controversial changes to their 10,000-word children’s reference, the Oxford Junior Dictionary. They’ve replaced a host of nature words, like acorn, otter, and blackberry, with new tech words like blog, broadband, and, yes, BlackBerry.The rationale, from Vineeta Gupta, who heads the children’s dictionary division over there, was that words are selected based on how likely they were to be used by children:“When you look back at older versions of dictionaries, there were lots of examples of flowers for instance, … That was because many children lived in semi-rural environments and saw the seasons. Nowadays, the environment has changed.”As that article notes, Canadian conservationist Robert Bateman is upset-and to read some of the comments there, so is a broader swath of humanity.The changes are a sign of the times, to be sure, and we can lament the marginalization of nature in our lives (I do), but the job of the Oxford University Press isn’t to symbolically save our ecosystem, it’s to codify our current lexicon. Moreover, preserving otter in the dictionary probably won’t preserve any additional actual otters out there in the wild.The debate is moot anyway because kids are abandoning tree-pulp dictionaries for digital ones, which aren’t limited to 10,000 words. This is not the most important battle for conservationists to fight.But it’s interesting. Here’s the full list of words that have been added and removed.Via PSFK.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

