This weekend in The New York Times climate change Cassandra and Nobel Prize-winner Al Gore laid out five steps for helping the U.S. gain its energy independence in the Age of Obama. It’s a goal, he notes, that’s been on the table since the Nixon administration; since the early 1970s, however, the country’s dependence on foreign oil has doubled from one-third of its use to two-thirds.If you’re a regular reader of Ben Jervey’s “New Ideal” series, you are probably familiar with a lot of these ideas (which stress a deep connection between our economy, our energy, and our environment). In broad terms, they are: building solar energy plants in our deserts, longitudinal wind farms through the middle of the country, and geothermal “hot spots” wherever possible; designing a smart-grid to take in and more effectively route electricity; incentivizing the Big Three automakers (and start-ups) to develop plug-in hybrid cars; retrofitting buildings to make them more energy efficient; and heading an effort to replace the Kyoto treaty with a more stringent document that calls for caps on worldwide carbon emissions.The group he hopes will play a big role in realizing these goals? The nation’s youth, which came out in droves to support the president-elect.(Photo © World Economic Forum/Severin Nowacki)
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

