Pencils up! MSNBC posted a quiz–which it calls “super-tough”–that covers the presidential horse race of the last two years. A few of us took it, and while we disagreed on its relative toughness–and quibbled about whether it had the occasional “gotcha!” question–we were able to agree on one thing: it’s time-consuming.Less a test of platforms and policy prescriptions and more a survey of biographical data and he said, she said rhetoric, it is certainly one method of measuring just how clued in you were to this historic election. So, if you have a moment (or several), try the quiz out for yourself; it might jog your memory regarding a few names that may have floated back to the recesses of your brain: Vilsack, Giuliani, Romney, Clinton.Oh, and pay special attention to the last question for a potential coda to this protracted process that Americans should hope to avoid.Photo from Flickr user NinJA999.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

