There was a great debate last night on NPR’s Talk of the Nation: should preachers be able to endorse a candidate in an election? Technically, if the leader of a house of worship uses the pulpit (or podium or what have you) to endorse a candidate, that house of worship should lose its 501c3 status. However, according to NPR, “a group of ministers have come together to challenge the IRS regulation that prohibits pastors from making political endorsements from the pulpit…So yesterday, more than 30 ministers took partisan messages to their congregants in a flagrant violation of-and challenge to-the IRS rule, in the hopes of generating a legal battle.”You can listen to the program here.You also might remember that we covered this dilemma of what happens when politics and the pulpit collide back in GOOD 002.And, while we’re on the topic of religion, you might consider looking at this Telegraph piece that explains how faith can relieve pain or this one on the case for (and against) faith.Photo by Ethan Hill (from the article “Render unto Caesar?” in GOOD 002)
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

