This past September, as the Donald Trump campaign was ending its tour through Iowa, its official campaign bus was listed for sale on Craigslist at $15,000. Then the ad disappeared. The people who bought that bus were Mary Mihelic and David Gleeson, two artists comprising the collective t.Rutt. They turned the bus into a roving anti-Trump artwork that has now traveled across the country—including the Democratic National Conventional in Philadelphia and the Republican National Convention in Cleveland last month.


Inside, the bus—which once served as a party vehicle for bachelor parties— has been tricked out with anti-Trump art, including a sewing station where the artists embroider Trump’s outlandish comments on American flags. Mihelic and Gleeson recently drove the bus down to the border, where they erected the first section of his proposed border wall, a 52-cinder block structure adorned with a Trump 2016 yard sign and a number of other objects. GOOD talked to the pair about what it was like to drive an anti-Trump campaign bus during some of the most politically contentious events of our time.

How are people receiving the bus? What are some of the reactions you guys are getting?

Mary Mihelic: The reactions range. I would say about 50 percent of the people understand the bus when they first look at it, and 50 percent of the people think it’s a pro-Trump bus. When people understand that it’s the opposite of a pro-Trump bus, their emotions change. We watch that transformation with people and try to get them laughing about the bus, especially the Trump supporters, and then we really engage with them about Trump. We get all sorts of reactions. In Tuscon, Arizona, somebody mooned us. It was really funny. About every two minutes, when we’re driving down the road, somebody gives us the finger. We’ve been keyed. We’ve been spray-painted. People have thrown ketchup and eggs at the bus. When people understand the bus, it’s a big love fest. You drive down around the DNC or the RNC and you go down the block and everybody whips out their cell phone and takes photos of the bus.

[quote position=”left” is_quote=”true”]When people understand that it’s the opposite of a pro-Trump bus, their emotions change… In Tuscon, Arizona, somebody mooned us.[/quote]

David Gleeson: I think one thing we’re realizing is that the bus becomes a really important way for people to connect with their emotions about Trump… and where the country is. People really have an emotional response. We have some good positivity. But, as Mary said, it’s initially pro-Trump people who are all excited. We do see them from all walks of life. It’s a little fascinating to see that he does have support. It’s not just “the angry white guys.” He has some other people who are just so fed up with the system.

Mihelic: We talk to everyone. We go to Trump rallies. They come over and talk to us. Because the bus has so many different things on it about all the different things Donald Trump has said, it has a lot of different ways to engage people about Trump. A lot of the times, veterans will come over and talk to us. We have “Save Water: Only waterboard on Monday, Wednesday and Friday” on the bus. So they start talking about how concerned they are about Trump bringing back torture and waterboarding and what that means for the military, and how they’re really not happy with Trump about that, and that’s the reason for them not to vote for Trump.

How did you guys conceive of the project? You just saw that the bus was for sale on Craigslist and decided to buy it?

Mihelic: I saw it on Rachel Maddow, who talked about how Trump’s campaign bus was for sale. I immediately called David up, and we could just see where this bus could take us the minute we knew it was sale. We bought it within 36 hours of seeing it for sale.

Gleeson: It was pretty quick. I didn’t want the Trump people to have time to take the graphics off. But they were pretty much asleep at the switch. It’s an old bus. It’s a 1981 Motorcoach. It has over a million miles on it. We think we put close to another 15,000 on it in this project. And it has been used for bachelor parties, so it’s a pretty sordid operation on the inside. It has a stripper pole in the back, and these tables for table-dancing, which we kept in the front. It’s crazy that it would have ever been his bus. But it says “Paid for by Donald J. Trump for President” on both sides and it has his hashtags. It’s just really bizarre. It’s the only bus he ever used.

What modifications did you make to it?

Mihelic: Inside, in the front of the bus, we added a dashboard shrine after Trump got into a tiff with the Pope, because I’m Catholic and you don’t mess with the Pope. We recently added a swear jar, because everyone yells ‘Fuck Trump!’ at us all the time, and we think people need to work on their vocabulary. Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court is draped in black fabric, so we roped off a double-wide seat in black fabric, just like it is on the Supreme Court. That’s going to stay roped-off until they replace Scalia.

[quote position=”right” is_quote=”true”]It has a stripper pole in the back… It’s crazy that it would have ever been his bus.[/quote]

Then there’s also an area where we do a performance where we embroider Trump quotes onto American flags in an artwork called ‘Desecration.’ We open up the bus windows and people can see the embroidery machine going and we ask people what quotes they’d like us to embroider. It kind of juxtaposes his statements against American ideals by putting them on the flag. And then when you go deeper into the bus and more towards the stripper pole, the bus starts to examine into Trump’s psychological and emotional state and what he’s like like that.

Gleeson: Then we got a little bit funnier and had some fun in the bathroom. We wallpapered the bathroom with diplomas from Trump University. We always imagined the inside being a space where people could talk about him.

Mihelic: We’re kind of an anomaly to the other protesters. They don’t really know what to make of us, because we’re not out there with picket signs. I think it’s important to get out there and do that. But I also think it’s really nice, with the bus, because we pull the Trump supporters in. It is kind of a Trojan Horse, as one art critic described it.

You also took the bus to the border, where you erected a portion of the wall that Donald Trump promised to build using anti-Trump art.

Mihelic: We came up with this idea to build the first section of the wall on the border of Mexico, in front of the existing fence. We didn’t really know what we were going to do. it was kind of impromptu.

Gleeson: We stopped off for gas [in this area called Jacumba]… and stayed at the hot springs. The next morning we were walking the ground and realized how close it was to the fence and we thought it had a wonderful feeling.

Mihelic: We contacted the landowner and found that this one person owned most of the town. He happened to be a nudist. We met with his wife and the next morning he agreed to let us build this wall there. We didn’t know that he was a Trump supporter at the time. We found that out after the fact. He loves art. He was game. He wanted people to know about Jacumba Hot Springs.

[quote position=”left” is_quote=”true”]We wallpapered the bathroom with diplomas from Trump University.[/quote]

Gleeson: We had been approached by the New York Times to do an exclusive, so I think he was perfectly happy for the exposure. As a nudist, that makes perfect sense.

On the wall, we incorporated a huge Trump yard sign that we had gotten in New Hampshire, a four-by-eight foot sign. We adorned the wall with some simple working tools that were agricultural and then we combined fruit and vegetables and flowers that would rather quickly rot in the heat.

You bought the truck in October. Were you sure, back then, that he would still be around during election time? Did you know that you would be making anti-Trump artwork in July, August?

Mihelic: Absolutely not. We bought the bus thinking we’d be doing it for a month or two. We joked about maybe November, December, maybe January, at the longest. It would be a couple months’ project, and he would be out. He was really a long-shot. And the reaction to the bus was really sleepy. Nobody really cared until February. We thought November of last year we’d be done with the project, certainly not November of this year. Let’s hope it’s not four years from November of this year.

Gleeson: So some people have asked us what will we do with the bus after the election. If he wins, we’d love to find somebody willing to hang the bus upside down in a museum or a huge gallery somewhere. It’s emblematic of how much he has succeeded in turning the world upside down. If he loses, we’ll try and take it to Hillary’s inauguration. I think it will mark a moment when the country was really able to overcome some of its most fear-based and negative impulses.

  • New York passes SAFE for Kids Act to protect children from social media addiction
    Photo credit: CanvaNew York hopes to improve children's usage of social media.
    ,

    New York passes SAFE for Kids Act to protect children from social media addiction

    New York hopes to curb social media’s access to young kids.

    “Kids and their phones these days” has been a complaint ever since the first cellular phone was introduced. However, there has been growing concern over the amount of time children spend not just on their phone, but scrolling through social media. The state of New York is hoping to address this issue through their finalized SAFE for Kids Act.

    The Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act aims to hold social media companies more accountable for the time children spend on their apps. It also seeks to limit kids’ exposure to their algorithms. Officials believe that constantly scrolling through social media feeds negatively impacts a child’s sleep and overall mental health.

    What are the restrictions?

    The new law requires social media companies to obey the following rules:

    • No addictive, algorithm-driven feeds for minors without explicit parental consent
    • No notifications about addictive feeds to minors between midnight and 6 a.m. without parental consent
    • No tricky website designs, called “dark patterns,” that manipulate or nag parents into giving consent
    • No degrading service, increasing prices, or retaliating against minors who don’t have parental consent for addictive feeds
    • Use certified age-assurance methods to distinguish minors from adults
    • Immediately encrypt data collected for age verification, use it only for age determination, and delete it immediately after use
    • Hire an accredited, independent third party to test and certify age-assurance methods every year

    Social media companies have until January 25, 2027 to comply. Failure to do so may result in a $5,000 fine per violation.

    New York Governor Kathy Holchul and Attorney General Letitia James made a public announcement to social media companies affected by this law, specifically Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, Snapchat, and X.

    “What changes is the default,” said James. “Platforms cannot automatically place minors into feeds engineered to maximize engagement. This is not a question of privacy, this is a question about content. This is not about the First Amendment. Again, this is about protecting children.”

    “Social media companies, you’re now on notice,” said Holchul. 

    Critics and the issues that still need to be addressed

    There are some criticisms of this law, particularly around age-verification. The law offers the option of using government-issued identification along with another proof of identity (such as an email address or an uploaded photo of the user). This complicates things aside from First Amendment rights. It would require millions of adults to share private information to scroll and post on social media after hours. While the law states that the companies must encrypt and erase such information upon age verification, that’s not guaranteed. This is especially concerning as social media companies already deal with users’ private information being hacked and leaked.

    Governor Holchul still believes this criticism isn’t a governmental issue but a business one that social media companies need to resolve.

    “Social media companies tell me, ‘We have no way of knowing whether someone’s under 18 or not,’” Holchul claimed. “I said, ‘You’re smart people. Use [artificial intelligence] to figure it out. Ask how you do it.’ And you’re not supposed to allow underage gaming anyhow—sports betting—so you must have some metric. So don’t tell me you can’t do it. Figure it out.”

    How parents can help their children on social media

    Regardless of where people stand on this law, experts offer some advice for parents who feel social media is negatively affecting their children. They recommend setting personal screen time limits for their children and taking advantage of built-in parental controls on their platforms. Parents limiting their own social media use can also influence how kids use it, too.

    Psychologists also recommend talking with children about how and why they use social media. Specifically, discuss the fantasy that social media showcases from influencers versus the real lives of those people. Talk about why there was a social media post (advertisement, sharing joy, hoping for engagement, etc.) along with the content of it. Asking how they feel after watching or reading content in their feed helps as well. Such practices, along with limiting exposure, creates trust between child and parent without judgement.

    Though how we fix screen and social media addiction is still largely in the air, take comfort knowing brilliant minds are exploring methods to address the growing issue.

  • New Russian research suggests that the human lifespan could be up to 156 years
    Photo credit: CanvaResearchers found what's preventing us from living longer.
    ,

    New Russian research suggests that the human lifespan could be up to 156 years

    Humans can live much longer if certain barriers are addressed.

    According to the Guinness Book of World Records, the oldest person lived to the ripe age of 122 years old. Such a lifespan is an incredible feat, but what if the average person could beat that record by 34 years? Recent research done in Russia has led scientists to believe that the average human lifespan could be up to 156 years.

    The researchers at Skoltech Biomed Technologies Center developed a mathematical model that allowed them to “switch on” a variety of aging mechanisms. This allowed them to calculate a human’s lifespan where mortality risk never increased with age. After experimenting with different scenarios and conditions, they found the biggest barriers to longevity were caused by non-renewable tissues and somatic mutations.

    What are these barriers against longer life?

    Somatic mutations are DNA changes within a cell. They accumulate over time during a human’s life and cannot be reversed with any existing therapy. These DNA errors that pile up in our cells contribute to the aging process.

    Many human organs like the liver and skin continually replace cells and regrow damaged portions of themselves. However, there are two organs that can’t do this: the brain and the heart. Brain tissue (neurons) and heart tissue (cardiomyocytes) cannot regenerate. This proves to be the most prominent biological limit that shortens our lifespans. This explains why issues like dementia and heart disease are prominent causes of death and morbidity later in life. Since those organs’ tissues don’t replace damaged cells, they’re prone to irrevocably decline over time.

    “The key finding of the study is the discovery of substantial differences between tissue types. Neurons and cardiomyocytes, which lack the ability to divide, turned out to be the main limiting factors: when all other causes of aging are eliminated, somatic mutations alone reduce the theoretical median lifespan from 1,759 years (for a hypothetical non-aging human organism) to 156 years,” said Evgeny Efimov, a research intern at the Skoltech Biomed Technologies Center, researcher at AIRI, and one of the key authors of the study.

    This suggests that somatic mutations and DNA damage is what ultimately prevents humans from living indefinitely, even if our brains and hearts regenerated cells like other organs.

    So what’s next?

    Now knowing these biological limitations, the researchers hope to study other areas of aging impacting the human lifespan that could plausibly be reversed. This includes mitochondrial dysfunction, telomere shortening, epigenetic drift, and loss of proteostasis. 

    The hope is to have a clearer priority list of issues for future therapies to tackle. This is not just to possibly extend life, but to improve lives in general. By developing a fully comprehensive theory of aging, Skoltech hopes to pinpoint which aspects of aging are within our scope to address. After all, thoroughly studying each puzzle piece that makes up human life gives us a better understanding of the whole.

    Of course, other impactful factors in a person’s lifespan can be addressed today. As most know, things like diet, sleep, and exercise are among them. A person’s living environment can also negatively impact their lifespan if it doesn’t have clean air, access to clean water, and so on.

    For now, the best method for living long is to follow instructions from your physician. Whether you make it to 156 years or not, living well is best for whatever time you’re given.

  • Woman documents her nephew’s late night culinary quests as the viral ‘Midnight Chef’
    Photo credit: @midnightchef_amir on InstagramAmir Jackson's late night cooking is going viral.
    ,

    Woman documents her nephew’s late night culinary quests as the viral ‘Midnight Chef’

    A 15-year-old cooking late night snacks is inspiring the Internet.

    One night in Apple Valley, California, Morgan Graham rose in the middle of the night. A smell had woken her up. It was pleasant, but at 11:28 p.m. she wasn’t expecting to smell delicious cooking. She went down into the kitchen to see her 15-year-old nephew, Amir Jackson, baking cookies.

    This was the first of several viral videos of Graham’s nephew cooking up a storm late at night. Jackson, who has been staying with his aunt during the summer, is taking advantage of her kitchen to whip up some sumptuous snacks.

    Birth of a Midnight Chef

    Nearly every night, Graham wakes up around midnight to the smell of cookies, cornbread, tacos, or whatever her nephew wants to prepare.

    “I don’t care,” said Graham in the initial video. “He’s very responsible. He’s not gonna burn the house down, so therefore, cook whatever you want.”

    Graham further explained in the video that Jackson looks at recipes daily. He also rummages through her pantry during the day to search for ingredients for his nightly cooking fest. 

    “In his world, he’s having the time of his life. In my world, I just want to stop waking up close to midnight to the smell of food,” Graham joked.

    Graham’s videos featuring her nephew have racked up millions of views on TikTok and Instagram. The commenters soon bestowed the nickname “Midnight Chef” upon Jackson, to general delight. In another video, Jackson explained he liked the peace and quiet of the night while preparing his dishes.

    “I was like, ‘Man, I could go for some cookies right now.’ I saw they had cookie dough, so I started just making them, just randomly,” Jackson told TODAY. “I was trying to make sure nobody was up. My thought process was just like, ‘Man, why not?’”

    Graham is encouraging her nephew to keep cooking even though it wakes her. In fact, Graham set up Jackson’s own Midnight Chef Instagram page for him to post his latest recipes.

    “I just want to experiment while I still got the chance to experiment. I’ll maybe like branch into different fields,” said Jackson. “Explore what I can do while I still got time to.”

    Why do we indulge in late night snacking?

    Jackson’s popularity has brought up a commonly asked question: Why do we crave food randomly in the middle of the night?

    Well, there’s actually a bit of science behind it. Turns out that late night snacking is a result of our circadian rhythm system. As part of our now-defunct survival mechanism, our ancestors would eat large meals at night to store energy in times of famine. This is also why most midnight snackers crave foods higher in fat, salt, and sugar compared to what they’d usually eat during the day. While there’s nothing inherently wrong with late night snacking, it could curb certain health goals if a person is trying to trim down.

    If you find yourself getting up in the middle of the night with a hankering for a snack, it may be worth taking a peek at Jackson’s videos. Who knows what kind of late night cooking it can inspire? Perhaps you’ll become a Midnight Chef yourself.

Explore More Stories

World

After 40 years in a Portuguese circus, elephant retires to become the first resident of a new sanctuary

Public Good

Oakland officials open ‘play-lending library’ to offset the cost of equipment for youth sports

Public Good

After a field trip for 100 low-income kids was canceled, police officer rents a whole movie theater for them

Local

14-year-old Montana kid rescues a drowning man with his lasso and rodeo skills