Trump Wants To Be Like Bill Clinton. This Is Why He’ll Fail

He ran against a Clinton, but now he desperately wants to be one.

Photo via William J. Clinton Presidential Library.

On Wednesday night, the political world erupted in the wake of yet another shocking announcement by President Donald Trump.

After nearly a year of embarrassing, immoral, and ineffectual moves, did Trump finally do something a majority of Americans can support? Could he finally be emerging as the post-partisan, centrist deal-maker that millions of Americans thought they had sent to Washington?

By this point, we should all know better.

First off, if you’re wondering what all this noise is about, let’s catch up:

On Wednesday, Trump hosted congressional leaders from both parties at the White House. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-New York), and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-California) were all on hand to discuss relief funds for Hurricane Harvey and the impending debt ceiling, which will result in a government shutdown if Congress doesn’t approve an extension first.

Republicans have been pushing for an 18-month extension of the debt ceiling. That would allow them to avoid any politically risky discussions about the federal budget until after the 2018 midterm elections. Democrats wanted a three-month extension, one that would put just such a debate front and center of the political news right as members of Congress are trying to close shop and race home for the holidays.

After a one-hour discussion in which both sides made their respective cases, Trump announced a deal had been made. And in a truly shocking moment, he gave Democrats Schumer and Pelosi everything they wanted, publicly praising “Chuck and Nancy” afterward.

Longtime political observers were quick to note the echoes of Bill Clinton’s presidency, in which he salvaged his meandering first term in office by orchestrating deals on big issues like balancing the federal budget and welfare reform with then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole.

It makes total sense why Trump would want to emulate Clinton – the former president was wildly popular, charismatic, and the first American politician since John F. Kennedy who could arguably be called a “sex symbol.” In many ways, he’s everything Trump wishes he could be and has so spectacularly failed to become.

Near the end of the 2016 presidential campaign, a series of photos emerged from the Clinton Presidential Library showing Trump socializing with Bill and Hillary Clinton back in 2000.

First and foremost, the photos were just bizarre to digest in the midst of the knife fight of an election.

But the thing that immediately caught my eye was how Trump was practically throwing himself at Bill, leaning in closely for photos and reportedly trying to build a tight-knit relationship with the “Man from Hope” who had just relocated to New York City.

Photo via William J. Clinton Presidential Library.

Photo via William J. Clinton Presidential Library.

Photo via William J. Clinton Presidential Library.

That said, Trump’s deal is nothing like any of Clinton’s famous deals with Republicans. The reason Clinton’s triangulation moves were so successful was that he managed to co-opt the most palpable aspects of Republican ideas and transform them into his own. Despite controlling both chambers of Congress, that left Republicans as the opposition party, forced to either acquiesce or stand in the way of popular, centrist proposals. Trump’s “deal” was simply giving minority leaders Schumer and Pelosi everything they want without extracting a single concession.

Meanwhile, Republicans have greeted the debt ceiling deal with nearly universal disdain. McConnell and Ryan are reportedly livid, and Trump’s most conservative allies in Congress are scraping their collective jaws off the finely marbled flooring of our nation’s capital. Trump himself seems ecstatic, reportedly calling Pelosi and Schumer to brag about how well the deal is being received by the same mainstream media he so often derides as “fake news.”

Again, we should all know better.

What Trump is really doing here is what he’s always done: Putting his own interests above all else.

Trump doesn’t care about policy. He doesn’t care about healing a sharply divided nation. He cares about his own self-preservation. And more than anything, the “very lonely” billionaire has an insatiable desire to be liked, something that has proved increasingly elusive in the early days of his disastrous presidency.

Making a deal with Democrats is good for Trump, even if it’s potentially disastrous for Republicans. And it doesn’t explicitly violate any of his core campaign promises: replacing Obamacare, building a wall between America and Mexico, and improving the economy.

And now there’s talk Trump wants to take things further with Schumer, with reports indicating the pair have discussed removing the ominous debt ceiling altogether, something that would prove politically convenient for the leaders of both parties but is certain to infuriate diehard members of the Freedom Caucus.

In the coming days, don’t be surprised if you hear about a “renewed” Trump presidency, one in which he teases out seductive deals with Democrats on a national infrastructure plan and a permanent version of the DACA program he shamefully scrapped just days before.

However, no matter where you fall on the political spectrum, it’s essential to remember that all we have here is a proverbial handshake deal that keeps the government running and sends essential relief funds to Texas and Louisiana. And all of this rests on the very real threat that a reliably capricious Trump could radically change his mind on a moment’s notice, throwing out whatever goodwill he’s potentially earned with his new best friends, Chuck and Nancy.

In that scenario, Trump may have truly exhausted any remaining slivers of hope that his presidency could be anything short of a disaster, a bloated cruise liner lumbering directly toward an iceberg no matter how clear the path appears on the left or the right.

Photo by Josh Couch on Unsplash

Christopher Columbus, Alexander Hamilton, William Shakespeare, and Sir Walter Scott are getting company. Statues of the famous men are scattered across Central Park in New York City, along with 19 others. But they'll finally be joined by a few women.

Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Sojourner Truth are the subjects of a new statue that will be on display along The Mall, a walkway that runs through the park from 66th to 72nd street. It will be dedicated in August of next year, which is fittingly the 100-year anniversary of the 19th Amendment that granted women the right to vote.

Currently, just 3% of statues in New York City are dedicated to women. Out of 150 statues of historical figures across the city, only five statues are of historical women, including Joan of Arc, Golda Meir, Gertrude Stein, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Harriet Tubman.

Keep Reading Show less

It's easy to become calloused to everyday headlines with messages like, "the world is ending" and "everything is going extinct." They're so prevalent, in fact, that the severity of these statements has completely diminished to the point that no one pays them any attention. This environmental negativity (coined "eco-phobia") has led us to believe that all hope is lost for wildlife. But luckily, that isn't the case.

Historically, we have waited until something is near the complete point of collapse, then fought and clawed to bring the species numbers back up. But oftentimes we wait so long that it's too late. Creatures vanish from the Earth altogether. They go extinct. And even though I don't think for a single second that we should downplay the severity of extinction, if we can flip this on its head and show that every once in a while a species we have given up on is actually still out there, hanging on by a thread against all odds, that is a story that deserves to be told. A tragic story of loss becomes one about an animal that deserves a shot at preservation and a message of hope the world deserves to hear.

As a wildlife biologist and tracker who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of animals I believe have been wrongfully deemed extinct, I spend most of my time in super remote corners of the Earth, hoping to find some shred of evidence that these incredible creatures are still out there. And to be frank, I'm pretty damn good at it!

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

For more than 20 years. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) has served the citizens of Maine in the U.S. Senate. For most of that time, she has enjoyed a hard-fought reputation as a moderate Republican who methodically builds bridges and consensus in an era of political polarization. To millions of political observers, she exemplified the best of post-partisan leadership, finding a "third way" through the static of ideological tribalism.

However, all of that has changed since the election of Donald Trump in 2016. Voters in Maine, particularly those who lean left, have run out of patience with Collins and her seeming refusal to stand up to Trump. That frustration peaked with the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Keep Reading Show less
NHM Vienna/Hans Reschreiter

Wealth inequality has been a hot topic of discussion as of late, but it's something that's occurred all throughout history. Class structure is a complicated issue, especially when you consider that haves and have nots have been in existence for over 4,000 years.

A study published in Science took a look at over 100 late Neolithic and early Bronze Age skeletons found in a burial site in southern Germany. The study "shed light on the complexity of social status, inheritance rules, and mobility during the Bronze Age." Partly by looking at their teeth and the artifacts they were buried with, researchers were able to discover that wealth inequality existed almost 4,000 years ago. "Our results reveal that individual households lasting several generations consisted of a high-status core family and unrelated low-status individuals, a social organization accompanied by patrilocality and female exogamy, and the stability of this system over 700 years," the study said.

Keep Reading Show less
via / Flickr and Dimitri Rodriguez / Flickr

Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign looks to be getting a huge big shot in the arm after it's faced some difficulties over the past few weeks.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a leading voice in the Democratic parties progressive, Democratic Socialist wing, is expected to endorse Sanders' campaign at the "Bernie's Back" rally in Queens, New York this Saturday.

Fellow member of "the Squad," Ilhan Omar, endorsed him on Wednesday.

Keep Reading Show less