We have a long history of advocating for 'traditional values,' especially when those values have racial animosity at their core.
Roosevelt spoke as a proud champion of "the Anglo Saxon race," and urged his people to embrace "the clear instinct for race selfishness." He advocated imperialism with the claim, "It is wholly impossible to avoid conflicts with the weaker races."
Roosevelt and Taft vigorously courted southern "lily-white" members of both parties. During an era of weekly southern lynching carnivals, Roosevelt told a black audience the "rapists and criminals" among them "did more harm to their race than any white man can possibly do them."
In 1909 President Taft told African American college graduates in North Carolina: "Your race is meant to be a race of farmers, first, last and for all times." Taft had the distinction of being the first Republican presidential candidate to campaign in the South. He announced he would never enforce "social equality" and told black audiences that the white southern man was their "best friend."
People of color could find little comfort, justice or even safety during the age of Roosevelt and Taft.
But this is a different time, and we as a nation wish to move toward "a more perfect union," to follow the Constitution, and embrace its promises. Why then do some intelligent people still manage to distort our past to send a wrong message? Perhaps they do so because lying about the past makes it easier to dissemble about the present.
As Richard Cohen wrote in the Washington Post in November,
"Today's G.O.P. is not racist, as Harry Belafonte alleged about the Tea Party, but it is deeply troubled—about the expansion of government, about immigration, about secularism, about the mainstreaming of what used to be the avant-garde. People with conventional views must repress a gag reflex when considering the mayor-elect of New York—a white man married to a black woman and with two biracial children. (Should I mention that Bill de Blasio's wife, Chirlane McCray, used to be a lesbian?) This family represents the cultural changes that have enveloped parts—but not all—of America. To cultural conservatives, this doesn't look like their country at all."
Sadly, just as Cohen believes we're post-racial, modern influencers such as Keller would have us believe that Taft and Roosevelt were also not racist—they were simply Presidents who advocated for policies that would ensure that "traditional" values would continue to rule. Never mind that many of those values had racial animosity at their core.
We can't move toward the fulfillment of the Constitution—for the common good—if we either continue to see the past through a racial revisionist lens, or continue to misconstrue the racism in our present. It might be more accurate to state some white American die-hards can't help but choose to live in a post-Mandela world. While they may celebrate his courage and achievements in the abstract, the cannot fully digest this brave South African who sacrificed his freedom and life for a world where people of all races, ethnicities, and kinds will try to live in peace and harmony.
William Loren Katz is the author of Black Indians: A Hidden Heritage, and forty other books on African American history. You can find more essays and a list of books by Katz at http://williamlkatz.com
Clock and chessboard image via Shutterstock
Share on Facebook
