You may have heard the phrase “cap and trade” recently. It’s one way we could rein in the greenhouse gases that are throwing our climate off-balance. What we’d do is this: set an economy-wide limit on emissions (the “cap”), and then let companies and industries buy and sell a limited number of permits to pollute (the “trading”). The free market would determine pollution’s cost. But for industries that have been polluting for free since industry began, suddenly having to pay for it doesn’t seem like such a great deal. Every industry will argue that it should get a chunk of the pollution permits for free. Figuring out how to allocate emissions permits isn’t going to be easy, but it’ll be one of the most important steps in actually getting a cap and trade system in place. If you’ve watched all the day’s viral videos and want to get a little more detail on how we can save the planet, this manageably wonky piece from WorldChanging will leave you feeling like an expert on pollution permit allocation.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

