President Obama gathered Senators from both sides of the aisle yesterday to talk about how to move forward on a comprehensive climate and energy bill. Details from the closed door meeting with seven Democrats and six Republicans and Independent Joe Lieberman are scarce, but parties involved seemed optimistic that it could produce a bill by the end of the year. “It was very useful for the president to hear the views of a wide range of members representing very diverse states, from energy producers like West Virginia and Alaska to energy importers like Maine,” said Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine).Perhaps most interesting were Lieberman’s comments after the “summit.” When asked about the future of “cap-and-trade,” Lieberman said, “We don’t use that term anymore. … We will have pollution reduction targets.”While this might feel like a panicked attempt at rebranding an unpopular (at least inside the Beltway) term , the vast majority of the American public (76 percent, in fact) have no idea what cap-and-trade actually is or does. So why not call it what it really is? Pollution reduction targets works alright for me. Maybe there’s something a little crisper or catchier. Senator Kerry should get Madison Avenue on it. Any ideas?Photo (cc) from Flickr user Gerald Simmons.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

