Back in 1860, “Soapy Sam” Wilberforce from the Church of England mocked Darwin supporter Thomas Huxley in the famous Oxford evolution debate, asking whether Huxley traced his lineage back to the apes through his grandfather or grandmother. Zing!Now, nearly 200 years after Darwin’s birth, Rev. Dr. Malcolm Brown from the Church of England apologizes for the confusion:”Charles Darwin: 200 years from your birth, the Church of England owes you an apology for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still.”In his essay Malcolm assesses the strengths and weaknesses of each “magisterium” (to borrow Stephen Jay Gould’s term):”…perhaps because the churches have not been good at equipping people to see God at work in the contemporary world – for all these reasons and others, a parody of science has become a focus for certain forms of social unease.”But also:”…the pseudo-Darwinian reductionism, which elevates selfishness into a virtue and celebrates power and dominance, is not only a misunderstanding of Darwin but may even contribute to human decline by eroding those aspects of being human which have given us such a natural advantage.”It’s fun to see an “apology” from the Church but this essay is also a really good example of how thoughtfulness and understanding can help bridge these cultural gaps. Richard Dawkins could learn a thing or two from Rev. Brown.Via Eyeteeth.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

