Privacy advocates have been vying with search engines for a while now, trying to establish some basic guidelines about how search engines like Google, Yahoo, and Bing can use and sell the information they gather about you. Some experts say six months should be the longest a search engine holds onto your information, but the majors currently hold onto data for as much as 18 months or longer.Over in Europe, there’s been pressure for some time from regulators-with no solid commitments made so far from the major players on the business side. As of today, though, bowing to pressure from a regulatory panel at the European Union, Microsoft has pledged it will lead the charge, and only hold onto your user data-IP address, text typed into search fields, etc.-for six months. Now it’s up to Google and Yahoo to follow suit. (And since Bing only accounts for only a sliver of the searches currently being performed, their move is pretty symbolic.)What do you think it a fair amount of time? How do you feel about companies collecting and using information they gather about you every time you Google (or Bing, or Yahoo) something?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

