There is a very interesting op-ed in the Times today (complete with handy chart by our friend Rob Di Ieso, Jr.) about applying game theory to terror attack prevention. The way the game works is that we try to secure our ports and airports, and terrorists try to find the easiest way through that security. We must, therefore, argues Lawrence Wein, make sure every possible permutation of routes that a bomb could enter the country is equally hardened. If one is easier, that is the one the terrorists will pick, but we wont know it, because we’re ignoring it.The chart breaks down all 132 ways that a dirty bomb could end up in an American city, so you can identify the choke points where money can be spent most efficiently to stop the most number of outcomes. Ideally, that means stopping anyone from putting a nuclear bomb on a plane or a boat in a foreign country. That becomes harder in principle, and to hear Wein tell it, we’re not doing a great job on a lot of the other options.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

